How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite matrix-product states and Hermitian Hamiltonians
Definition
Fix a field , an order , and positive physical dimensions . The finite coefficient space is the tensor-array space with the Frobenius pairing and lexicographic index conventions of Finite tensor arrays and the Frobenius inner product. A normalized finite state is an array with .
An open-boundary matrix-product state (MPS), or tensor train (TT), presentation is a TT core list from Tensor train cores, bond ranks, and canonical gauges with whose contraction is . In particular, each core has shape and the shared internal indices are summed.
A periodic MPS presentation consists of positive integers with and matrices for each . It represents the array A finite MPS/TT state is a normalized array admitting at least one of these exact presentations; a presentation need not be unique or canonical.
A finite Hermitian Hamiltonian input is a linear endomorphism whose matrix in the standard lexicographic basis satisfies , where is conjugate transpose as in Finite tensor arrays and the Frobenius inner product. This page uses only that finite-dimensional Hermitian input and makes no claim about how a physical model assembles it. For nonzero , its Rayleigh energy is for a normalized state this equals .
Diagram
The diagram records the open-boundary chain with a two-site center. Each box is a core or the contracted center tensor, each horizontal wire is a summed virtual bond index, and each vertical open leg is a free physical index. Cores to the left and right of the center are isometric in their respective matricizations when the chain is in mixed canonical gauge. These wire conventions abbreviate the exact finite index sums in the definition and are not used as a proof.
Depends on
Used by
- Finite alternating tensor optimization with effective eigenproblems Algorithm
- A degenerate local ground eigenspace has a deterministic tie choice Example
- A two-site spin-chain local solve reaches the exact ground state Example
- A two-site TT truncation can increase energy after an exact solve Example
- A periodic finite MPS has an exact open-boundary TT conversion Lemma
- Canonical MPS environments are isometric and the effective Hamiltonian is Hermitian Lemma
- Rank-revealing QR sweeps give exact mixed canonical gauge Lemma
- An exact local DMRG ground solve does not increase Rayleigh energy Proposition
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ulrich Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326 (2011), §§4.1–4.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Grégoire Misguich, Introduction to matrix-product states and tensor networks, complete lecture notes (2026), §§2.1–2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ivan V. Oseledets, Tensor-Train Decomposition, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 33(5) (2011), §1 (standard reference, not scraped)