Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite matrix-product states and Hermitian Hamiltonians

Definition

Fix a field F∈{R,C}, an order d≥2, and positive physical dimensions n1,…,nd. The finite coefficient space is the tensor-array space H=Fn1×⋯×nd with the Frobenius pairing and lexicographic index conventions of Finite tensor arrays and the Frobenius inner product. A normalized finite state is an array ψ∈H with ∥ψ∥F=1.

An open-boundary matrix-product state (MPS), or tensor train (TT), presentation is a TT core list from Tensor train cores, bond ranks, and canonical gauges with r0=rd=1 whose contraction is ψ. In particular, each core has shape rk−1×nk×rk and the shared internal indices are summed.

A periodic MPS presentation consists of positive integers r0,…,rd with rd=r0 and matrices Ak(ik)∈Frk−1×rk for each 1≤ik≤nk. It represents the array ψi1,…,id=tr⁡ ⁣(A1(i1)A2(i2)⋯Ad(id)). A finite MPS/TT state is a normalized array admitting at least one of these exact presentations; a presentation need not be unique or canonical.

A finite Hermitian Hamiltonian input is a linear endomorphism H:H→H whose matrix in the standard lexicographic basis satisfies H∗=H, where ∗ is conjugate transpose as in Finite tensor arrays and the Frobenius inner product. This page uses only that finite-dimensional Hermitian input and makes no claim about how a physical model assembles it. For nonzero ψ, its Rayleigh energy is EH(ψ)=⟨ψ,Hψ⟩F∥ψ∥F2; for a normalized state this equals ⟨ψ,Hψ⟩F.

Diagram

The diagram records the open-boundary chain with a two-site center. Each box is a core or the contracted center tensor, each horizontal wire is a summed virtual bond index, and each vertical open leg is a free physical index. Cores to the left and right of the center are isometric in their respective matricizations when the chain is in mixed canonical gauge. These wire conventions abbreviate the exact finite index sums in the definition and are not used as a proof.

G1¢¢¢Gk¡1Xk;k+1Gk+2¢¢¢Gd®k¡1®k+1i1ik¡1ik;ik+1ik+2id

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources