Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-horizon offline reinforcement-learning dataset and coverage

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice for the policy-induced path laws below. Let S be a nonempty finite state set, let A(s) be a finite nonempty action set for each s∈S, and let R⊂R be a finite nonempty reward set. A finite Markov decision process here consists of these sets and a joint next-state/reward probability mass p(s′,r∣s,a)≥0, defined for s,s′∈S, a∈A(s), and r∈R, with ∑s′∈S∑r∈Rp(s′,r∣s,a)=1 for every (s,a). A stationary Markov policy σ assigns probabilities σ(a∣s)≥0 with ∑a∈A(s)σ(a∣s)=1 at every state.

Fix a horizon H≥1, a discount 0≤γ≤1, and an initial state s0∈S. A trajectory is a tuple τ=(s0,a0,r1,s1,…,aH−1,rH,sH) with st∈S, at∈A(st), and rt+1∈R for each 0≤t<H. Write ΩH for the finite set of all such tuples. For each stationary policy σ, let PHσ be the probability law on ΩH whose atom masses are

PHσ({τ})=∏t=0H−1σ(at∣st)p(st+1,rt+1∣st,at).

For a trajectory τ, its finite-horizon return is GH(τ)=∑t=0H−1γtrt+1, and the value of target policy π from s0 is JH(π;s0)=∫ΩHGH dPHπ. A fixed logged dataset of size n≥1 consists of independent trajectories (τ1,…,τn), each with law PHμ for a behavior policy μ; the true behavior propensities μ(a∣s) used to generate the data are known. Full horizon coverage means PHπ≪PHμ, so every behavior-null trajectory event is also target-null. In this finite setting, the condition π(a∣s)>0⇒μ(a∣s)>0 at every state-action pair reachable under π before time H is sufficient for full horizon coverage. A trajectory function is integrable under a law P when ∫ΩH∣f∣ dP<∞. All returns are integrable in this finite-horizon finite-reward setting; importance-weighted return expressions below are used only when they are integrable.

Remarks

The stated state-action support condition implies full horizon coverage. Here a state-action pair (s,a) is reachable under π before time H when PHπ(St=s,At=a)>0 for some 0≤t<H. Suppose a trajectory atom τ has PHπ({τ})>0. Its atom mass is a product of nonnegative factors, so every target action probability and every shared transition/reward factor along τ is positive. Each state-action pair on τ is therefore reachable under π, and the support condition gives μ(at∣st)>0 at every time. The same initial state and transition/reward factors then give PHμ({τ})>0. Since ΩH is finite, every event is a finite union of atoms; thus every PHμ-null event is also PHπ-null, proving PHπ≪PHμ.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources