How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional additive Gaussian channel with average power
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Choice. Fix an integer and a real symmetric positive-definite matrix . The -dimensional additive Gaussian channel with power budget has input and output spaces and single-use law At each use a fresh independent copy of is added, so the channel is memoryless. The input cost is . A length- deterministic code with equiprobable messages meets the average block power constraint when Rates are measured in nats per vector use. The noise law is Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance; positive definiteness of gives the Lebesgue density stated in A positive-definite multivariate normal law has its Gaussian density. The scalar case is the real AWGN channel. Rates use the natural logarithm The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function.
Depends on
Used by
- Causal feedback codes for a finite-dimensional Gaussian channel Definition
- Orthogonal reduction of a correlated two-dimensional Gaussian channel Example
- Water-filling for noise variances one and four Example
- Orthogonal coordinates diagonalize a finite-dimensional Gaussian noise law Lemma
- Parallel Gaussian information density obeys a finite-variance law of large numbers Lemma
- Strictly feasible Gaussian inputs yield cost-feasible Gaussian codes Lemma
- Capacity of finite parallel Gaussian channels with and without feedback Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu, Information Theory: From Coding to Learning, Chapter 20 §20.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Yury Polyanskiy, MIT 6.441 Information Theory, Chapter 17 §17.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- David J. C. MacKay, Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms, Chapter 12 §12.3 (standard reference, not scraped)