Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Presentations of algebraic spaces

Definition

A presentation of an algebraic space F over S (Algebraic spaces over a scheme, defined as fppf sheaves) is a pair consisting of an S-scheme U, an etale equivalence relation j=(t,s) ⁣:R→U×SU on U over S (Groupoids in schemes, relations and etale equivalence relations) and a surjective etale morphism U→F such that R=U×FU, that is, such that j identifies R with the kernel pair of U→F (Fibre product of schemes). By Surjective etale maps from schemes give presentations every surjective etale morphism from a scheme to F yields a presentation: the kernel pair U×FU is an etale equivalence relation and F is its quotient sheaf. Conversely a presentation determines F as U/R.

A presentation is quasi-compact when U is quasi-compact. This depends on the chosen cover: under the inherited Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), a nonempty affine scheme S has both the presentation S→S and the non-quasi-compact presentation ∐n≥0S→S. The open components of the latter source have no finite subcover.

A presentation is separated, locally separated or locally quasi-finite when j is respectively a closed immersion (Closed immersions of schemes), an immersion, or separated and locally quasi-finite. These diagonal conditions are independent of the presentation: j is the base change of ΔF along the surjective etale cover U×SU→F×SF, and closed immersions and immersions are fppf local on the target (Stacks, Descent Lemmas 35.23.21 and 35.24.1). Moreover the separated locally quasi-finite condition on j holds for every presentation: j is a monomorphism, hence separated, and is locally of finite type because s is etale; its fibres have at most one point, so it is locally quasi-finite (Stacks Lemma 65.13.1). This condition concerns the diagonal and does not say that F→S is locally quasi-finite.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources