Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Quotient maps of etale equivalence relations are etale surjective

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the quotient-sheaf suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let j=(s,t) ⁣:R→U×SU be an etale equivalence relation on an S-scheme U over S (Groupoids in schemes, relations and etale equivalence relations) and let F=U/R be its fppf quotient sheaf (The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation). If F is an algebraic space over S (Algebraic spaces over a scheme, defined as fppf sheaves), then the canonical morphism c ⁣:U→F is representable, etale and surjective; hence (U,R,U→F) is a presentation of F (Presentations of algebraic spaces).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An etale equivalence relation (U,R,s,t) over S with quotient sheaf F=U/R, and the assumption that F is an algebraic space; AC.

[F1]

F is the sheafification of the naive quotient presheaf; a section a ⁣:T→F has an fppf covering {φi ⁣:Ti→T} and morphisms ai ⁣:Ti→U with c∘ai=a∘φi, and the pairs (ai,ai′) factor fppf-locally through R. Uniqueness from the relation monomorphism makes these transitions agree on overlaps, so the represented sheaf of R descends them to global transitions rii′ (The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent).

[F2]

Under AC, étale morphisms are stable under base change and, for locally finitely presented morphisms, étaleness is equivalent to flatness and vanishing relative differentials. Flatness descends along faithfully flat scalar base change, and differentials commute with scalar base change (Étale stability, Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change, Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change).

[F3]

For an arbitrary morphism a ⁣:T→F, the fibre product hU×F,aT is computed objectwise: its T′-points are pairs (u,φ) with u ⁣:T′→U, φ ⁣:T′→T and c(u)=aφ (Representable morphisms of presheaves and fibrewise properties).

[F4]

Under AC, flat locally finitely presented morphisms are open. A flat ring map with surjective map on spectra is faithfully flat, and faithful flatness reflects exactness, hence detects zero modules (Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open, A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3

The fibre product is a scheme, fppf-locally on T. Let a ⁣:T→F and choose the presentation of [F1]. Over Ti the projection π ⁣:T×a,F,cU→T base changes to πi ⁣:Ti×φi,T(T×a,F,cU)→Ti, and by [F3] the source is computed as Ti×ai,U,tR: a T′-point is a pair (t′,r) with t′ ⁣:T′→Ti, r ⁣:T′→R and t(r)=ait′, which maps to U by s(r) and thus defines a point of the fibre product. Conversely, equality in F gives a local R-witness by [F1]; its uniqueness and represented-sheaf descent make it a unique global witness. Thus this map is an isomorphism of presheaves. Since t is étale, πi is the base change of the étale t along ai, hence étale; it is surjective because t is.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1given

π is representable, etale and surjective. Representability uses the assumed algebraicity of F: the sheaf T×FU is the pullback of ΔF along the scheme T×SU→F×F, hence is a scheme. Each local base change πi is etale by step 1.1. Etaleness descends here as follows. Over an affine target open Spec⁡A, the images of affine opens in the fppf cover form an open covering by [F4]. Quasi-compactness selects finitely many covering affine opens; their disjoint union is an affine fppf refinement Spec⁡B→Spec⁡A, and A→B is faithfully flat by [F4]. For an affine source open Spec⁡C, local finite presentation of the base change means C⊗AB is a finitely presented B-algebra. Tensor coefficients of its finitely many generators supply finitely many generators of C over A, by faithful flat detection of the quotient module. For the resulting presentation A[x1,…,xm]↠C, its kernel extends to the kernel over B by flatness; finitely many tensor coefficients of generators of this extended ideal generate the original ideal by faithful flat detection. Thus C is finitely presented. Flatness descends by [F2], and ΩC/A vanishes because its scalar extension vanishes by differential base change and faithful flat detection; [F2] then gives etaleness. Surjectivity descends on points, since the cover is onto and each πi is onto. Therefore c is representable, etale and surjective.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

The presentation. By step 2.1 the morphism c is representable, etale and surjective, and R=U×FU is the kernel pair of c by the local-witness and descent argument of step 1.1; hence (U,R,U→F) is a presentation of the algebraic space F in the sense of Presentations of algebraic spaces. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the quotient-sheaf construction of [F1].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources