How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quotient maps of etale equivalence relations are etale surjective
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the quotient-sheaf suppliers (The Axiom of Choice). Let be an etale equivalence relation on an -scheme over (Groupoids in schemes, relations and etale equivalence relations) and let be its fppf quotient sheaf (The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation). If is an algebraic space over (Algebraic spaces over a scheme, defined as fppf sheaves), then the canonical morphism is representable, etale and surjective; hence is a presentation of (Presentations of algebraic spaces).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An etale equivalence relation over with quotient sheaf , and the assumption that is an algebraic space; AC.
is the sheafification of the naive quotient presheaf; a section has an fppf covering and morphisms with , and the pairs factor fppf-locally through . Uniqueness from the relation monomorphism makes these transitions agree on overlaps, so the represented sheaf of descends them to global transitions (The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation, Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent).
Under AC, étale morphisms are stable under base change and, for locally finitely presented morphisms, étaleness is equivalent to flatness and vanishing relative differentials. Flatness descends along faithfully flat scalar base change, and differentials commute with scalar base change (Étale stability, Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change, Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change).
For an arbitrary morphism , the fibre product is computed objectwise: its -points are pairs with , and (Representable morphisms of presheaves and fibrewise properties).
Under AC, flat locally finitely presented morphisms are open. A flat ring map with surjective map on spectra is faithfully flat, and faithful flatness reflects exactness, hence detects zero modules (Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open, A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra, Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms).
Proof
The fibre product is a scheme, fppf-locally on . Let and choose the presentation of [F1]. Over the projection base changes to , and by [F3] the source is computed as : a -point is a pair with , and , which maps to by and thus defines a point of the fibre product. Conversely, equality in gives a local -witness by [F1]; its uniqueness and represented-sheaf descent make it a unique global witness. Thus this map is an isomorphism of presheaves. Since is étale, is the base change of the étale along , hence étale; it is surjective because is.
is representable, etale and surjective. Representability uses the assumed algebraicity of : the sheaf is the pullback of along the scheme , hence is a scheme. Each local base change is etale by step 1.1. Etaleness descends here as follows. Over an affine target open , the images of affine opens in the fppf cover form an open covering by [F4]. Quasi-compactness selects finitely many covering affine opens; their disjoint union is an affine fppf refinement , and is faithfully flat by [F4]. For an affine source open , local finite presentation of the base change means is a finitely presented -algebra. Tensor coefficients of its finitely many generators supply finitely many generators of over , by faithful flat detection of the quotient module. For the resulting presentation , its kernel extends to the kernel over by flatness; finitely many tensor coefficients of generators of this extended ideal generate the original ideal by faithful flat detection. Thus is finitely presented. Flatness descends by [F2], and vanishes because its scalar extension vanishes by differential base change and faithful flat detection; [F2] then gives etaleness. Surjectivity descends on points, since the cover is onto and each is onto. Therefore is representable, etale and surjective.
The presentation. By step 2.1 the morphism is representable, etale and surjective, and is the kernel pair of by the local-witness and descent argument of step 1.1; hence is a presentation of the algebraic space in the sense of Presentations of algebraic spaces. The Axiom of Choice is inherited from the quotient-sheaf construction of [F1].
Depends on
- The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation
- Groupoids in schemes, relations and etale equivalence relations
- Algebraic spaces over a scheme, defined as fppf sheaves
- Presentations of algebraic spaces
- Representable morphisms of presheaves and fibrewise properties
- Étale morphism of schemes
- The Axiom of Choice
- Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent
- Flatness descends along faithfully flat base change
- Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation
- Kähler differentials commute with scalar base change
- Étale stability
- Flat finite-presentation morphisms are open
- A flat ring map is faithfully flat exactly when it detects proper ideals and is surjective on spectra
- Flat and faithfully flat modules and ring homomorphisms
- Flat locally finitely presented restrictions give open subquotients
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Chapter 65 (Algebraic Spaces), Lemma 65.10.3 (standard reference, not scraped)