How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation
Definition
Let be a scheme and let be morphisms of -schemes (Morphisms of schemes). For an -scheme , let be the equivalence relation on the set generated by the pairs for (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set , Fibre product of schemes). The relations are compatible with restriction along , because a point restricts to and are natural, so is a presheaf of sets, the naive quotient presheaf , and the quotient maps are natural.
The fppf quotient sheaf is the sheafification of (Fppf sheaves of sets and sheafification, Sheafification exists for the fppf site): the initial fppf sheaf receiving , with its universal property. Its construction uses the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the sheafification lemma. The naive quotient presheaf and the quotient sheaf differ in general, and no representability of by a scheme or algebraic space is asserted.
Two standard special cases are used below. If is a field and is a group scheme of finite type over (Group schemes of finite type over a field) acting on a -scheme , one takes with the second projection and the action morphism , and writes for the quotient sheaf. If and is a closed subgroup scheme (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes) acting by right translation, one takes with and , and writes . In both cases the quotient sheaf is the fppf sheafification of the corresponding naive quotient.
Depends on
- Fppf coverings and the fppf site
- Fppf sheaves of sets and sheafification
- Sheafification exists for the fppf site
- Morphisms of schemes
- Fibre product of schemes
- Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set $A/{\sim}$
- The Axiom of Choice
- Group schemes of finite type over a field
- Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes
Used by
- Flat locally finitely presented restrictions give open subquotients Lemma
- Quotient maps of etale equivalence relations are etale surjective Lemma
- Surjective etale maps from schemes give presentations Lemma
- The quotient of an affine etale equivalence relation is an algebraic space Lemma
- Quotients of schemes by etale equivalence relations are algebraic spaces Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Chapter 65 (Algebraic Spaces), Section 65.5 with Chapter 8 (Stacks) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Angelo Vistoli, Notes on Grothendieck topologies, fibered categories and descent theory (arXiv:math/0412512) (standard reference, not scraped)