Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The fppf quotient sheaf of a pre-relation

Definition

Let S be a scheme and let s,t ⁣:R→U be morphisms of S-schemes (Morphisms of schemes). For an S-scheme T, let ∼T be the equivalence relation on the set U(T)=Mor⁡S(T,U) generated by the pairs (s(ξ),t(ξ)) for ξ∈R(T) (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set A/∼, Fibre product of schemes). The relations ∼T are compatible with restriction along T′→T, because a point ξ∈R(T) restricts to R(T′) and s,t are natural, so T⟼U(T)/∼T is a presheaf of sets, the naive quotient presheaf PU/R, and the quotient maps U(T)→U(T)/∼T are natural.

The fppf quotient sheaf U/R is the sheafification of PU/R (Fppf sheaves of sets and sheafification, Sheafification exists for the fppf site): the initial fppf sheaf receiving PU/R, with its universal property. Its construction uses the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the sheafification lemma. The naive quotient presheaf and the quotient sheaf differ in general, and no representability of U/R by a scheme or algebraic space is asserted.

Two standard special cases are used below. If S=Spec⁡k is a field and G is a group scheme of finite type over k (Group schemes of finite type over a field) acting on a k-scheme U, one takes R=G×kU with s the second projection G×kU→U and t the action morphism G×kU→U, and writes U/G for the quotient sheaf. If U=G and H⊆G is a closed subgroup scheme (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes) acting by right translation, one takes R=G×kH with s(g,h)=g and t(g,h)=gh, and writes G/H. In both cases the quotient sheaf is the fppf sheafification of the corresponding naive quotient.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources