How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
EQP on promise problems in the QC14 model
Definition
A promise problem belongs to in the QC14 model if there is a full-list uniform family and a polynomial-time total acceptance predicate as in Finite quantum promise-computation model, Full-list uniform quantum circuit family, and Quantum acceptance probability for a finite promise computation, using the exact gate and cost conventions of Circuit-family and computation cost model and Clifford+T gate library and exact matrices, such that
No condition is imposed on (Promise problem). The finite output law is normalized by The partial-output acceptance law is a finite probability law.
Depends on
- Promise problem
- Finite quantum promise-computation model
- Full-list uniform quantum circuit family
- Quantum acceptance probability for a finite promise computation
- Circuit-family and computation cost model
- Clifford+T gate library and exact matrices
- The partial-output acceptance law is a finite probability law
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
38 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, Chapter 13, Section 13.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Watrous, Quantum Computational Complexity, Section IV.1 (standard reference, not scraped)