How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Code Deviation and Fault Spread
Definition
Consider one block of tensor factors , its code subspace , and an arbitrary finite reference system . For an integer , let be the complex linear span of all operators on the block supported on at most physical coordinates, with support and weight as in Support and weight of an operator on a finite register.
A density operator on the block and is -deviated from a code-supported density operator if there is a CPTP map on the block with a finite Kraus family such that and . Here is code-supported when its joint support is contained in . The reference factor is retained in the identity above. Equality of reduced states outside a coordinate set is not the definition of deviation here.
For a finite family of live blocks indexed by , use the joint error space . Joint -deviation means the same Kraus formula with a single CPTP map on all live blocks, every Kraus operator in , and identity on the external reference alone. The ideal joint state is supported in . This includes the original one-block definition when . The joint error map need not factor across blocks: a faulty multi-block gate can correlate their errors. Other live data blocks are part of the data system, not part of the unchanged external reference. Statements about deviation per block in a multi-block computation use this joint convention.
There is also a weaker encoded instrument error-sector relation, which does not require a CPTP extension to the whole physical input space. Fix the joint encoding . An -supported encoded instrument is a finite family of completely positive branch maps from the joint logical register to the physical register, with Kraus operators
Thus its full instrument is trace preserving on the admitted encoded input domain. A branch retains its actual subnormalized probability; neither it nor its normalized conditional output is required to extend to a full-space CPTP error map. With an ideal logical unitary , replace in this formula by . For other ideal logical instruments, state the analogous Kraus identities and output registers explicitly. Every equality is tensored with identity on an arbitrary finite external reference. With auxiliary fault memory , allow coefficients on , that is Kraus sums , and impose the full instrument's trace-preservation identity on . Memory output may change; after its trace, the logical/reference channel is the one required by the declared decoded-recovery identity.
A correcting gadget states the stronger input-sector/output-sector operator identity it needs: on every admitted incoming error term , its branch Kraus maps are sums of with the prescribed output support budget. Coefficients may depend on the incoming error term and on retained branch/memory registers, but not act on the logical factor. Linearity covers coherent incoming errors and correlated blocks. This is the sector convention for noisy correcting instruments. The earlier full-space CPTP deviation relation remains a sufficient, stronger relation; it is not redefined to mean this weaker encoded relation.
For an integer , literal support-propagation spread applies to a specified unitary circuit segment: conjugating a fault operator supported on through the remaining fault-free unitary gates produces an operator supported on at most output coordinates per block. For several faults, expand the finite Kraus families and take the union of their propagated supports. This gives the sum of the individual support bounds. The bound must account for all input blocks of a multi-block gate.
For a correcting, preparing or measuring gadget, an effective spread budget is instead part of an explicit input-sector/output-sector contract. The gadget declares its admitted joint error sectors, allowed fault supports, ideal logical channel or instrument, and joint residual-error sector for each allowed fault count. The required identities compare its decoded output with that ideal logical channel or instrument on every admitted input, with an arbitrary finite external reference. Measurement identities are identities of the subnormalized branch maps, not equations obtained by ignoring their probabilities. Any auxiliary fault memory is retained in the description of the faulty maps and may change there; it is distinct from the untouched external reference, and nonfaulty locations leave that memory alone. An identity that retains fault memory must specify its output memory action rather than silently identify it with the reference identity.
The numerical computation and correction budgets needed for sparse induction are explicitly imposed in the separately stated proper-code gadget contract; the word spread alone supplies none of those identities. In particular, incoming-error propagation and the full noisy correction action must be checked. Zero-fault recovery on arbitrary inputs remains a separate requirement. No global equation moving arbitrary input faults through a recovery channel on its whole input space is asserted.
Remarks
The distinction between full-space CPTP deviation and encoded instruments, a concrete nonextension example on the code, and transfer of a fixed decoded recovery to the encoded instrument relation are proved in Encoded error instruments and full-space CPTP error maps. That comparison is not needed to define either relation.
Depends on
Used by
- Fault-Tolerant Gadget and Proper-Code Contract Definition
- A Finite Four-Round Verified Shor Correction Circuit Lemma
- An explicit scalar phase completes Clifford+T to full unitary density Lemma
- Encoded error instruments and full-space CPTP error maps Lemma
- Finite Verified Steane Magic States and T Injection Lemma
- Sparse Fault Paths Preserve Correctable Code Deviation Lemma
- Twice-Concatenated Steane Code and Its Transversal Clifford Gates Lemma
- Verified Steane Initialization and Protected Classical Readout Lemma
- An Explicit Proper Code and Universal Fault-Tolerant Gadgets Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- D. Aharonov and M. Ben-Or, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation With Constant Error (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Computation, Chapter 7: Quantum Error Correction (standard reference, not scraped)