How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Detectable operators and distance of a finite-register quantum code
Definition
Let be an isometric encoding into a fixed ordered -factor register with , , and code projector . An operator is detectable by the code if there is a scalar such that
When , define the quantum distance by
where .
When , set by convention; the non-detectable set is empty in that case, as proved in Detectable operators form a subspace and quantum distance is well defined ↗. The same theorem proves that the minimum for exists, the condition is linear in , and changing to for a logical unitary leaves unchanged.
This definition distinguishes detection from recovery: no recovery map or correction criterion is asserted here. In particular the distance theorem on this page only proves detection below ; correction maps are deferred to QC19.
Remarks
The convention for a one-dimensional logical space is a sentinel larger than every possible operator weight. It avoids treating a minimum of an empty set as an ordinary integer minimum.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Richard Cleve, Quantum Information Processing course notes, §§36.1, 36.3, and 37.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Preskill, Quantum Computation, Chapter 7, §§7.1 and 7.4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)