How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Removable border strips and their height
Definition
Let be a partition with English Young diagram , so that rows are numbered downward and columns rightward, and let be a subpartition, so that the skew diagram is the set of nodes of outside (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation, Skew diagrams and semistandard skew tableaux). Two nodes are side-adjacent when their coordinates differ by exactly one in exactly one coordinate.
A removable border strip of (also called a skew hook or rim hook) is a nonempty set of nodes of such that
(i) is edge-connected: any two nodes of are joined by a chain of side-adjacent nodes of ;
(ii) contains no block: there are no nodes all belonging to ;
(iii) is again the Young diagram of a partition, say for a partition .
Equivalently, a removable border strip is a skew diagram that is connected and contains no block; since the complement of in is , condition (iii) is then automatic, and (i) and (ii) say exactly that the skew diagram is connected and free of blocks. We write in that case. The size of is its number of nodes ; a removable border strip of size is a removable -strip, and then .
The height (also leg length) of a nonempty connected border strip is
The counting identity. If a removable border strip has nodes and occupies distinct columns and distinct rows of , then , hence . Indeed is a connected, -free skew diagram with complement a Young diagram. Every strip node lies on the rim: if belonged to , it could not belong to , since that would force ; and the partition inequalities then put all four nodes of the corresponding block in the strip, a contradiction. The rim nodes in row have columns , where missing row lengths are zero. Read each such interval from right to left, then move down at column to the next row: these are exactly the rim nodes and their side-adjacencies. Thus the rim is a single path moving left or down, and its connected subsets are subpaths. The steps of consist of downward steps and leftward steps, since the path visits exactly the occupied rows and exactly the occupied columns, whence .
In particular exactly when is a horizontal strip, that is, occupies at most one node in each column, and in general is the number of columns occupied. A removable border strip of size is exactly a removable node (Removable and addable nodes): a single node is edge-connected and contains no block, and its removal leaves a Young diagram precisely when the node is removable. No choice principle is used.
Remarks
-
Border strips are the pieces of the rim that can be peeled off. Since has complement the Young diagram , its nodes form a contiguous stretch of the lower-right rim of : reading the strip from its north-east end to its south-west end one moves only leftward or downward, and the strip is determined by the pair . This is the sense in which removable border strips are the "skew hooks" of James §18 and the "border strips" of Macdonald I §3 and §7.
-
Height counts rows, not nodes in a column. A vertical strip, occupying a single column of nodes, has and , the largest possible height for a strip of size ; the rows-occupied count then agrees with the node count. The height sign is the one used in the Murnaghan–Nakayama rule (The Murnaghan–Nakayama character rule).
-
Conventions. The empty set is not a removable border strip: condition (i) applies to a nonempty set, and the height of a strip requires at least one occupied row. A removable border strip is thus never empty, and the skew diagram is valid notation for the empty diagram, but is not a removable border strip. The height convention agrees with the leg length of the hook of under the hook/rim-hook correspondence (Hooks of a partition correspond bijectively to removable border strips).
Depends on
Used by
- A missing removable strip of the cycle length forces a zero character value Corollary
- A disconnected removable rim set is not a border strip Counterexample
- Equal removable-hook counts do not replace the core test Counterexample
- Level-one global-basis transition polynomials in the symmetric-group convention Definition
- Murnaghan–Nakayama values of the character of (5,4,4) Example
- The 3-cycle filter for ν=(3,2) on S₈ Example
- The three-core of (4,3,2,1) by two removal orders Example
- Alternating hook induction cancels disconnected rim removals Lemma
- Hooks are bead-gap pairs on the abacus Lemma
- Hooks of a partition correspond bijectively to removable border strips Lemma
- The r-cycle virtual character filter Proposition
- The e-core is independent of the rim hook removal order Theorem
- The Murnaghan–Nakayama character rule Theorem
- The q-Schaper virtual radical-layer formula Theorem
- The q-Schur Weyl weight-space Gram determinant is a hook product Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- G. D. James, The Representation Theory of the Symmetric Groups, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 682, Springer 1978 (complete author-hosted scan, 161 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- I. G. Macdonald, Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd ed., Oxford Mathematical Monographs, 1995 (complete author-hosted scan, 486 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- William Woods, Representation theory of the symmetric groups (Cambridge Part III essay, 33 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)