Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Removable border strips and their height

Definition

Let λ⊢n be a partition with English Young diagram [λ], so that rows are numbered downward and columns rightward, and let ν⊆λ be a subpartition, so that the skew diagram [λ/ν]=[λ]∖[ν] is the set of nodes of [λ] outside [ν] (Partitions, English diagrams, and conjugation, Skew diagrams and semistandard skew tableaux). Two nodes are side-adjacent when their coordinates differ by exactly one in exactly one coordinate.

A removable border strip of λ (also called a skew hook or rim hook) is a nonempty set ξ of nodes of [λ] such that

(i) ξ is edge-connected: any two nodes of ξ are joined by a chain of side-adjacent nodes of ξ;

(ii) ξ contains no 2×2 block: there are no nodes (i,j),(i+1,j),(i,j+1),(i+1,j+1) all belonging to ξ;

(iii) [λ]∖ξ is again the Young diagram of a partition, say [λ]∖ξ=[ν] for a partition ν⊢n−∣ξ∣.

Equivalently, a removable border strip is a skew diagram λ/ν that is connected and contains no 2×2 block; since the complement of [λ/ν] in [λ] is [ν], condition (iii) is then automatic, and (i) and (ii) say exactly that the skew diagram is connected and free of 2×2 blocks. We write ξ=λ/ν in that case. The size of ξ is its number of nodes ∣ξ∣; a removable border strip of size r is a removable r-strip, and then ν⊢n−r.

The height (also leg length) of a nonempty connected border strip ξ is ht⁡(ξ):=(number of distinct rows of [λ] occupied by ξ)−1.

The counting identity. If a removable border strip ξ has r nodes and occupies c distinct columns and w distinct rows of [λ], then w=r−c+1, hence ht⁡(ξ)=r−c≥0. Indeed [λ/ν] is a connected, 2×2-free skew diagram with complement a Young diagram. Every strip node (p,q) lies on the rim: if (p+1,q+1) belonged to [λ], it could not belong to [ν], since that would force (p,q)∈[ν]; and the partition inequalities then put all four nodes of the corresponding 2×2 block in the strip, a contradiction. The rim nodes in row p have columns max⁡(1,λp+1),…,λp, where missing row lengths are zero. Read each such interval from right to left, then move down at column λp+1 to the next row: these are exactly the rim nodes and their side-adjacencies. Thus the rim is a single path moving left or down, and its connected subsets are subpaths. The r−1 steps of ξ consist of w−1 downward steps and c−1 leftward steps, since the path visits exactly the w occupied rows and exactly the c occupied columns, whence r−1=(w−1)+(c−1).

In particular ht⁡(ξ)=0 exactly when ξ is a horizontal strip, that is, occupies at most one node in each column, and in general c=r−ht⁡(ξ) is the number of columns occupied. A removable border strip of size 1 is exactly a removable node (Removable and addable nodes): a single node is edge-connected and contains no 2×2 block, and its removal leaves a Young diagram precisely when the node is removable. No choice principle is used.

Remarks

  • Border strips are the pieces of the rim that can be peeled off. Since [λ/ν] has complement the Young diagram [ν], its nodes form a contiguous stretch of the lower-right rim of [λ]: reading the strip from its north-east end to its south-west end one moves only leftward or downward, and the strip is determined by the pair (ν,λ). This is the sense in which removable border strips are the "skew hooks" of James §18 and the "border strips" of Macdonald I §3 and §7.

  • Height counts rows, not nodes in a column. A vertical strip, occupying a single column of r nodes, has c=1 and ht⁡=r−1, the largest possible height for a strip of size r; the rows-occupied count w=ht⁡+1=r then agrees with the node count. The height sign (−1)ht⁡ is the one used in the Murnaghan–Nakayama rule (The Murnaghan–Nakayama character rule).

  • Conventions. The empty set is not a removable border strip: condition (i) applies to a nonempty set, and the height of a strip requires at least one occupied row. A removable border strip is thus never empty, and the skew diagram λ/λ is valid notation for the empty diagram, but is not a removable border strip. The height convention agrees with the leg length ℓ(x) of the hook of x under the hook/rim-hook correspondence (Hooks of a partition correspond bijectively to removable border strips).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources