How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Reverse row deletion
Definition
Let be a standard tableau with distinct real entries (Tableaux and standard tableaux) and let be a removable node of (so for ). The reverse row deletion is the following procedure. Set and (a symbol larger than every real number). While : let be the largest index with and (for this is , the box ), set and overwrite the entry of box by (for this empties the box ); if stop, otherwise replace by and repeat. The procedure terminates after exactly row visits, since strictly decreases and stops at . Its result is the filling of obtained by the overwrites, and the expelled letter is . We write .
The index exists at every step, and is a standard tableau, so the procedure is well defined. For existence: after a row has been processed, the carried letter was the entry of the box before that box was overwritten, where is the position used in row ; the box of the row above lies in the diagram, because , and by column strictness of it carries an entry strictly smaller than ; hence the set over which is defined is nonempty, and it is finite, so is well defined. For standardness of : at the moment row is processed it is still the unmodified row of , and is the largest index with , so when those neighbours exist, which keeps the row strictly increasing after the overwrite; the entry above the overwritten box is ; and the entry below, after row has been processed, is larger than : if it is the overwriting letter , and if it is the unchanged entry in column of row , which exceeds the unchanged entry by row strictness. Thus all strict inequalities of a standard tableau hold in . Finally, every entry of other than survives in with multiplicity one: each row visit moves one entry upward into the box it overwrites and the single box is emptied, so the multiset of entries of is that of with deleted; in particular is not an entry of . No choice is used: the procedure is deterministic and all data are finite.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Donald E. Knuth, Permutations, Matrices, and Generalized Young Tableaux, Pacific Journal of Mathematics 34 (1970), 709-727 (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. Schensted, Longest Increasing and Decreasing Subsequences, Canadian Journal of Mathematics 13 (1961), 179-191 (13 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)
- David A. Craven, Groups, Geometries and Representation Theory (Spring Term 2013 lecture notes, 42 pp.) (standard reference, not scraped)