How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices
Definition
Let be a reduced crystallographic root system with base (Positive systems and simple roots, Simple roots form a signed integral basis) and coroots (Coroot and dual root system). The root lattice, coroot lattice, weight lattice, and coweight lattice are All four sets are additive subgroups of , since the integrality conditions are preserved by addition and negation; they are free abelian groups of rank , for and because the simple roots and the simple coroots are bases of , and for and because the simple coroots are again a basis so the dual lattice is generated by the dual basis. The chain holds because the Cartan integers are integers for all roots (Reduced crystallographic Euclidean root system).
Depends on
Used by
- Affine root hyperplanes, coroot translations, alcoves, and the affine reflection group Definition
- Crystallographic scalings: scaled simple roots, coroots and the root, coroot and weight lattices Definition
- Fundamental weights Definition
- Integral, dominant, and strictly dominant weights Definition
- Root order on weights Definition
- The Weyl vector Definition
- Root versus coroot translation lattices: A2, B2 and two conventions Example
- The A₁ affine line: alcoves, translations, and the root versus coroot lattice Example
- The A₂ root and weight lattices: P/Q has order three Example
- The extended affine Weyl group and non-trivial alcove stabilizers Example
- The two realizations of I₂(4): B₂ and C₂ with their lattices and duality Example
- Not every abstract dominant weight integrates False statement
- Affine reflections: translation form, involutivity, local finiteness, and Wₐ=Q^∨⋊ W Lemma
- Chevalley basis and real structure constants Lemma
- Complex-weight separation of Harish-Chandra characters Lemma
- Crystallographic alcove diagrams: the affine list realized by Weyl types A–G Lemma
- Generic galleries, boundary-fixed disks, and the gallery-move calculus Lemma
- Weyl denominator and anti-invariant orbit sums Lemma
- Central quotients and intermediate character lattices Proposition
- Dominant weights in fundamental coordinates Proposition
- Root and weight lattice sandwich Proposition
- Alcove transitivity, the affine Coxeter presentation, and the length function Theorem
- Classification of affine Coxeter diagrams and their Euclidean simplex realization Theorem
- Crystallographic finite type: the Weyl types, reduced realizations and lattice stability Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed., Chapter II (standard reference, not scraped)