How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Not every abstract dominant weight integrates
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Every dominant weight in the abstract weight lattice integrates to a representation of every compact group form with the given Lie algebra.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume the Axiom of Choice, the group (the adjoint form of type ) with maximal torus , and the fundamental weight of the type root system.
Irreducible finite-dimensional representations of a compact connected are classified by the dominant elements of the actual character lattice (Highest weights for compact connected groups).
For type the weight lattice is with root lattice , and the adjoint form has character lattice (Root and weight lattice sandwich, Root, coroot, weight, and coweight lattices).
Refutation
The fundamental weight is dominant in , and it is not an element of ; hence for the adjoint form , whose character lattice is by [L2], the weight lies outside .
If some irreducible finite-dimensional representation of had highest weight , then would be a dominant element of the actual character lattice by the classification in [L1]; this contradicts step 1.1.
Therefore is a dominant weight of the abstract weight lattice that does not integrate to the compact group form ; the correct statement is the classification by dominant elements of the actual character lattice , between and , and the failure is exactly the finite central quotient obstructing the descent of the -representation of highest weight .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
32 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Anthony W. Knapp, Lie Groups Beyond an Introduction, 2nd ed. (standard reference, not scraped)