How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Rudin ordinal box spaces on infinite index sets
Definition
Assume AC. Fix an infinite and put
Each factor is the ordinal interval with its order topology, as in The order topology on an ordinal, with the half-open intervals and the initial segments as a basis. Give the box topology: its open sets are unions of boxes with every open in its factor. The whole product is such a box, and the intersection of two boxes is the box with factors , so this prescription defines a topology. In contrast, The product set of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space restricts a basic box to have only finitely many factors different from the whole factor. No such restriction is imposed here.
The Rudin space on is the subspace
The witness may depend on the point , but one must bound the cofinalities of all its coordinates. Both inequalities are strict. The coordinate endpoint is allowed when the uniform cofinality condition permits it.
Use pointwise to mean at every coordinate, and define
The bounds are members of with ; they need not belong to . These half-open boxes, and in particular at , give the local base proved in Clopen boxes and the P-space property ↗. Eventual comparisons remain those of Reduced products, true cofinality and scales; pointwise and eventual comparisons are distinct conventions throughout.
Depends on
- Reduced products, true cofinality and scales
- The order topology on an ordinal, with the half-open intervals $(\alpha, \beta]$ and the initial segments $[0, \beta]$ as a basis
- The product set $\prod_{i \in I} X_i$ of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
18 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- K. P. Hart, Set-Theoretic Methods in General Topology, Chapter 6 section 1, printed p. 35 (standard reference, not scraped)