How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A split set in a bull-free graph
Definition
Let be a finite graph and let with . We say that is split when, for every vertex that is neither complete nor anticomplete to , there exist distinct vertices such that one of the following holds:
- -- is an induced path in (so are edges and is a nonedge), with adjacent to and and nonadjacent to ; or
- and are adjacent in , while is nonadjacent to and is nonadjacent to , and is adjacent to and nonadjacent to and .
The definition is complement-invariant: is split in if and only if it is split in , because clause in is clause in , clause in is clause in , and completeness swaps with anticompleteness.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Maria Chudnovsky and Shmuel Safra, The Erdős-Hajnal conjecture for bull-free graphs, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)