Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

States and positive functionals on a C star algebra

Definition

Let A be a complex C*-algebra (C star algebra) and recall that positivity in A is the algebraic condition a=b∗b, without spectral hypotheses (Self-adjoint positive unitary and normal elements). A linear functional ω:A→C is positive if ω(a∗a)≥0for every a∈A, and a state if in addition ∥ω∥=1, the norm being the operator norm of the bounded linear functional on A.

Remarks

  • The positive functionals form a convex cone. If ω,φ are positive, s,t≥0 and a∈A, then (sω+tφ)(a∗a)=s ω(a∗a)+t φ(a∗a)≥0. In particular the positive functionals of norm at most one form a convex set, since ∥sω+tφ∥≤s+t whenever s,t≥0. Being bounded with norm one is part of the definition of a state, not a consequence claimed here.
  • Cauchy–Schwarz. Every positive functional satisfies ∣ω(b∗a)∣2≤ω(a∗a) ω(b∗b)(a,b∈A). Indeed, for all z∈C linearity gives ω((a+zb)∗(a+zb))=ω(a∗a)+z ω(a∗b)+zˉ ω(b∗a)+∣z∣2ω(b∗b)≥0. The left side is a nonnegative real number for every z. Taking z=1 and z=i and using that both resulting values are real shows ω(a∗b)+ω(b∗a)∈R and i(ω(a∗b)−ω(b∗a))∈R; hence ω(b∗a)=ω(a∗b)‾. Writing p=ω(a∗a)≥0, q=ω(b∗b)≥0 and u=ω(a∗b), the displayed inequality reads p+2Re⁡(zu)+∣z∣2q≥0 for all z. If q>0, insert z=−uˉ/q to obtain p−∣u∣2/q≥0, that is ∣u∣2≤pq; if q=0, the same inequality forces Re⁡(zu)≥−p/2 for all z, which is impossible unless u=0, and then ∣u∣2=0≤pq. Since ∣ω(b∗a)∣=∣ω(a∗b)‾∣=∣u∣, this is the stated inequality.
  • Continuity and the norm formula. Assume AC for the calculus and approximate-unit suppliers (The Axiom of Choice, Positive calculus and order estimates in a C star algebra, Positive contractive approximate units for C star algebras and ideals). Write A+ here for the positive cone, not the unitization, and put M=sup⁡{ω(b):b∈A+, ∥b∥≤1}. This supremum is finite: otherwise choose positive contractions bn with ω(bn)>n2n. The norm-convergent series b=∑n≥12−nbn is positive, and b−2−nbn is positive because the positive cone is closed. Positivity would give ω(b)≥2−nω(bn)>n for every n, a contradiction. Every self-adjoint h is h+−h− with h±≥0 and ∥h±∥≤∥h∥ by the calculus. Thus ω(h) is real and ∣ω(h)∣≤M∥h∥. Decomposing x=h+ik, with ∥h∥,∥k∥≤∥x∥, gives ∣ω(x)∣≤2M∥x∥, proving continuity. For a positive contractive approximate unit uλ, Cauchy–Schwarz gives ∣ω(uλx)∣2≤ω(x∗x)ω(uλ2)≤M2∥x∥2. Passing to uλx→x gives ∥ω∥≤M; the reverse inequality follows from the definition of the operator norm. Hence ∥ω∥=M. A nonzero positive functional therefore becomes a state upon division by its norm. The zero algebra has no state.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

23 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources