Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The norm of a positive element is the supremum of its state values

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A be a C*-algebra and let a∈A with a≥0 (Self-adjoint positive unitary and normal elements, Positive calculus and order estimates in a C star algebra). Then ∥a∥=sup⁡{ω(a):ω a state of A} (States and positive functionals on a C star algebra). For the zero algebra the supremum of the empty subset of [0,∞) is understood as 0. No state-value formula for arbitrary non-self-adjoint elements is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a C*-algebra A with ambient unital C*-algebra B (B=A if A is unital, B=A+ otherwise); an element a∈A with a≥0.

[F1]

Positivity and order toolkit: a≥0 has σ(a)⊆[0,∞) and ∥a∥=max⁡σ(a); for self-adjoint h and continuous f, the calculus element f(h)∈C∗(1,h)⊆B satisfies ∥f(h)∥=sup⁡σ(h)∣f∣ and σ(f(h))=f(σ(h)); conjugation preserves positivity; the unitization is a unital C*-algebra containing A (Positive calculus and order estimates in a C star algebra, Minimal C star unitization).

[F2]

A functional ω on A is positive when ω(x∗x)≥0 for all x, and a state when moreover ∥ω∥=1; every state satisfies ∣ω(x)∣≤∥x∥ (States and positive functionals on a C star algebra).

[F3]

Under AC every bounded linear functional on a subspace of a normed space has a norm-preserving extension (A bounded complex linear functional on a subspace of a complex normed space extends with the same norm).

Proof

technique · direct

Given: AC, a C*-algebra A with ambient unital C*-algebra B, and a∈A with a≥0; for the main argument assume a≠0.

1.1F1F2F3

Put λ0:=∥a∥=max⁡σ(a), so λ0∈σ(a) by [F1], and consider the closed unital ∗-subalgebra C∗(1,a)⊆B. Evaluation at λ0, ev(g):=g(λ0) for g∈C∗(1,a) identified via the calculus with continuous functions on σ(a), is a linear functional with ev(1)=1, ev(a)=λ0=∥a∥ and ∣ev(g)∣≤∥g∥, because ∥g∥=sup⁡σ(a)∣g∣ by [F1]; hence ∥ev∥=1=ev(1). By [F3] it extends to a bounded linear functional f on B with ∥f∥=1. Also, for every state ω and every x, ∣ω(x)∣≤∥x∥ by [F2], so ω(a)≤∥a∥ for the positive element a; this will give the upper bound.

2.1F1step 1.1

The functional f is positive on B. Let h∈B be self-adjoint. For real t the element eith has modulus one in the calculus, ∣eith∣=1 on σ(h), so σ(eith)⊆T and ∥eith∥=1 by [F1]; hence ∣f(eith)∣≤1. Writing f(h)=x+iy with x,y∈R, linearity and the norm convergence of the exponential series give f(eith)=1+itf(h)+O(t2) as t→0; the real part is 1−ty+O(t2), and 1−ty+O(t2)≤∣f(eith)∣≤1 yields y=0 after letting t→0 through positive and negative values. Thus f is real on self-adjoint elements. If now 0≤b≤1 in B, then ∥1−b∥≤1 by [F1], so ∣1−f(b)∣=∣f(1−b)∣≤1, and since f(b) is real this gives f(b)≥0; rescaling any positive b≠0 to b/∥b∥ shows f(b)≥0, and f(0)=0.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1

Restrict f to A: the restriction ω:=f∣A is positive because x∗x≥0 in A and f is positive on B by step 2.1; and ∥ω∥≤∥f∥=1 while ∥ω∥≥∣f(a)∣/∥a∥=1 because a≠0 and f(a)=ev(a)=∥a∥. Hence ω is a state of A with ω(a)=∥a∥.

4.1step 1.1step 3.1

Therefore sup⁡{ω(a):ω a state}≥ω(a)=∥a∥, while step 1.1 gives the reverse inequality for every state, so the supremum equals ∥a∥. If a=0 and A≠{0}, choose x≠0 and apply step 3.1 to x∗x≠0 (using ∥x∗x∥=∥x∥2≠0) to obtain a state, and every state vanishes at 0, so the supremum is 0=∥0∥. If A={0} the set of state values of 0 is empty and the stated empty-supremum convention gives 0=∥0∥.

5.1givenF3∎

The Axiom of Choice is used for the norm-preserving Hahn–Banach extension of step 1.1 and is inherited from the calculus and unitization suppliers; the positivity and supremum arguments use no further choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources