Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Chern–Weil map for a chosen connection

Statement

Let M be a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold, possibly with boundary. Let E→M be a smooth rank-r real or complex vector bundle with a supplied G-frame atlas, where G is a real or complex matrix Lie group, and let ∇ be a fixed connection compatible with that reduction. For the algebra of finite sums of Ad⁡(G)-invariant polynomials P=∑kPk with values in K∈{R,C}. For each Pk, write Pkpol for its normalized symmetric polarization (with P0pol=P0), and define CW⁡E,∇(P)=∑k[Pkpol(Ω∇,…,Ω∇)]∈HdReven(M;K). where a degree-k polynomial maps to cohomological degree 2k. The map is a graded unital K-algebra homomorphism, with polynomial multiplication on the source and wedge product on the target, and CW⁡E,∇(1)=[1]. The coefficient convention for HdR(M;K) on boundary manifolds is specified below. This definition depends on the fixed connection; independence of its cohomology value is a later theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M, E, the supplied G-frame atlas, its compatible connection, and a finite sum of G-invariant polynomials with coefficients in K∈{R,C}.

[F1]

Degree zero evaluates as the corresponding constant 0-form (Evaluation of an invariant polynomial on curvature).

[F2]

A compatible connection and invariant polynomial give a global K-valued curvature form (Evaluation of an invariant polynomial on curvature).

[F3]

The global evaluation of each homogeneous invariant polynomial on the curvature is closed, including degree zero (Closedness of invariant curvature forms).

[F4]

Each homogeneous invariant polynomial has a unique normalized symmetric polarization whose diagonal is the polynomial (Invariant symmetric polynomials on a matrix Lie algebra).

[F8]

Finite sums of homogeneous invariant polynomials form an algebra under addition and multiplication (Invariant symmetric polynomials on a matrix Lie algebra).

[F5]

On a manifold with boundary the real forms form a cochain complex and the exterior derivative obeys the graded Leibniz rule; its cohomology is formed as cycles modulo boundaries (The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary).

[F6]

On a boundaryless manifold the published real de Rham cohomology is a unital graded-commutative real algebra with unit [1] (De rham cohomology ring).

[F7]

The real de Rham cohomology of the empty manifold is the zero algebra with 1=0 (De rham cohomology ring).

Definition

For the real coefficient target, use the ordinary real de Rham complex when ∂M=∅ and the locally extendible boundary-chart complex from [F5] when M has boundary; write its cohomology ring as HdR∙(M;R). Its product is induced by wedge: the graded Leibniz rule in [F5] makes exact changes of a closed representative exact. For K=R, set HdR∙(M;K)=HdR∙(M;R). For K=C, set Ω∙(M;C)=Ω∙(M;R)⊗RC,dC=dR⊗1,HdR∙(M;C)=H∙(Ω∙(M;C),dC). This is the complex-valued smooth-form complex, with boundary coefficients locally extendible componentwise. Real and imaginary parts split its cycles and exact forms, so its cohomology is HdR∙(M;R)⊗RC; wedge and the unit extend C-linearly. On the empty manifold the target is the zero algebra with 1=0, as in [F7].

For a polynomial Pk homogeneous of degree k, use its polarization Pkpol in the global form from [F2]. Define the map by taking its cohomology class and summing over the homogeneous components. No connection-independence assertion is included in the definition.

Proof

Well-definedness and algebra law.

1.1F5F6F7givenalgebra

The target complex for K=C is the complexification of the real complex: every complex-valued form is uniquely α+iβ with real forms α,β, and d(α+iβ)=0 exactly when dα=dβ=0; it is exact exactly when both real and imaginary parts are exact. Hence cohomology splits as the stated complexification, wedge induces its K-algebra product by the graded Leibniz rule in [F5], and for boundaryless M the real target agrees with the unital ring [F6]. If M=∅ it is the zero algebra [F7].

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1given

For every homogeneous component Pk, the global form supplied by [F2] is closed by [F3], so it determines a class in the target cohomology from step 1.1; degree zero is the constant 0-form [F1], also closed. The finite sum therefore defines the displayed map.

3.1F2F4F8step 2.1algebra

Let Pk,Qℓ be homogeneous with normalized symmetric polarizations Pkpol and Qℓpol. The normalized polarization from [F4] of their product, which is an invariant polynomial by [F8], is (PkQℓ)k+ℓpol(A1,…,Ak+ℓ)=(k+ℓk)−1∑S⊆{1,…,k+ℓ}∣S∣=kPkpol(As1,…,Ask)Qℓpol(At1,…,Atℓ), where s1<⋯<sk list S and t1<⋯<tℓ list its complement. This is symmetric and multilinear with diagonal PkQℓ. On setting every Aj equal to the curvature 2-form, every summand evaluates to Pk(Ω∇k)∧Qℓ(Ω∇ℓ): scalar coefficient forms have even degree and commute. Thus evaluation preserves products, including k=0 or ℓ=0, and passing to cohomology gives the algebra law.

4.1F1F4F7F8step 1.1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Multilinearity of polarization [F4], exterior multiplication, and the cohomology quotient makes the map K-linear and degree doubling. By [F1], the constant polynomial 1 evaluates to the constant 0-form 1, hence to the target unit; if M is empty both are the zero-algebra unit 0 by [F7]. This proves the unital graded algebra claim. The connection is fixed throughout, and no step asserts that changing it leaves the class unchanged. The atlas and connection are supplied data, so no axiom of choice is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources