Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Thom class and Thom isomorphism: the AT interface

Definition

Assume AC as in The Axiom of Choice. Let E→B be an R-oriented numerable rank-r real vector bundle over a CW complex, or over a paracompact Hausdorff base of CW type. Its AT Thom class is the unique uE∈Hr(D(E),S(E);R) of Thom class by fiberwise normalization, whose restriction to every oriented fiber disk pair is the supplied generator. In the based quotient model Dh(E)/Sh(E) of Disk, sphere, and Thom spaces of a metric vector bundle write the same class in H~r(Th⁡h(E);R)≅Hr(D(E),S(E);R). The isomorphism is the actual quotient-map pullback of The Thom quotient identifies relative and reduced cohomology, proved there from the exact cohomology excision and natural pair-sequence interfaces, including reduced degree0 and the empty sphere case. In rank zero it reads H~k(B+;R)≅Hk(B;R) in every degree, with the supplied rank-zero orientation normalization. The AT theorem Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles gives the isomorphism a↦π∗a⌣uE from Hk(B;R) onto Hk+r(D(E),S(E);R) for all k, and Naturality and uniqueness of Thom classes gives uniqueness, oriented pullback naturality and integral sign reversal. For R=F2 the orientation is automatic. No Thom class and no Thom isomorphism is constructed again in DT: the collapse and duality statements below consume exactly this interface. On compact smooth bases the finite-cover AT proof is available choice-free once the cover and its data are supplied; references to the general supplier retain its stated AC assumption.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

24 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources