Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value

Definition

Fix 1≤p<∞ and a function f∈Lp(R), with the Lp conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. For ε>0 and x∈R define the truncated Hilbert transform

Hεf(x):=1π∫∣x−y∣>εf(y)x−y dy=1π∫∣t∣>εf(x−t)t dt.

Each truncation is an ordinary Lebesgue integral over the complement of an interval of length 2ε around x, and it is absolutely convergent. For p=1 this follows from the pointwise bound ∣1/(x−y)∣<ε−1 on the domain of integration; for 1<p<∞ it follows from Hölder's inequality applied to the two half-lines x−y>ε and x−y<−ε, where ∣x−y∣−1 has finite Lq norm, with q conjugate to p (Complex Holder, Minkowski, and the quotient norm). Changing f on a null set changes no integral, so Hεf(x) is a well-defined number attached to the class of f; and Hεf is itself a measurable function of x.

The Hilbert transform in the principal-value sense is defined only where the truncations converge:

Hpvf(x):=lim⁡ε↓0Hεf(x),

whenever this limit exists in C. No almost-everywhere existence of this limit, and no bound of Hpvf in any Lp norm, is asserted by this definition. The definition also does not extend Hε to L∞: for the tail ∣x−y∣>ε the bound ∥f∥∞/ε is finite but the integral over an unbounded domain is not controlled, so the truncation of a merely bounded f need not converge absolutely at any x.

Three distinctions are recorded here for later use. First, Hεf is an integral of a truncated singular kernel, while the pairing of a test function with the principal-value distribution of 1/(πx) is a separate object; the two agree only under the convergence just defined. Second, the limit is taken symmetrically in ε about the singularity y=x, and unsymmetric truncations are a different object. Third, Hpvf is a pointwise partial function, whereas the L2(R) extension constructed later on this page is a single bounded operator agreeing with Hpv where the latter exists on a dense class.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources