How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hilbert transform of an interval indicator
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and let be the indicator of the open unit interval, with the conventions of Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions. Write
Then:
- for every the symmetric principal value exists and equals , the logarithm being taken at the positive argument ;
- the function represents the Hilbert transform of almost everywhere, that is, in .
The values at the two endpoints are immaterial: every assertion is about the complement of the Lebesgue-null set , and no claim is made about at .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, the indicator with , and the truncated Hilbert transform of Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value.
For and , , absolutely convergent for , ; is the limit where it exists. Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value
For Schwartz the principal value exists at every and equals for the tempered convolution with , and the extension has symbol and satisfies . The Hilbert transform is the tempered convolution with pv(1/(pi x)) and has signum Fourier multiplier The Hilbert transform is an L2 isometry and squares to minus the identity
There is with , on and off . Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs
For real the interval is Lebesgue measurable with ; and if are measurable then . A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
A function with generates the mollifier family , and is an approximate identity. The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump A unit-mass smooth bump generates an approximate identity
If and , then ; in particular in . Every approximate identity converges to the identity in for
For locally integrable the convolution is smooth; and . Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset
On : is differentiable with , , and ; is strictly increasing. With the chain rule this gives for . The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if is differentiable at and is differentiable at , then is differentiable at with
Oriented additivity over subintervals and the second fundamental theorem: on a compact interval on which the integrand is continuous with the displayed antiderivative, the integral is the antiderivative difference, and . For : is integrable on if and only if it is integrable on and on , and then ; with the oriented form for arbitrary The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then
Norm-convergent sequences in have subsequences converging almost everywhere to a representative of the limit. Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences
Proof
Let and . Substituting in [F1] and using exactly for gives , the integrand being continuous on each piece because is either excluded by the truncation or avoided.
Construction of approximants. Put with as in [F3]. The bounds and [F4] give , so and is nonnegative with . Let be its mollifier family and put for . By [F7] each is smooth, and since and , the support inclusion gives . Also, if , the bump samples only where is constant, so ; hence is supported within distance of the endpoints, and . Since and , moreover pointwise: .
Case . For one has , so by [F8] and [F9].
Case . For one has , so by [F8], the antiderivative of on the negative axis being .
Case . For the set is , so by [F9] , the two terms cancelling exactly because ; since this is .
By [F6] applied with and , the sequence of 1.2 satisfies and ; consequently in , and the boundedness of [F2] gives , where is both the transform of and the pointwise principal value of [F2].
Fix and put ; let be the constant value of on and set . The mollifier is supported in , so for its convolution samples only points of when the argument lies in ; hence 1.2 gives there. Thus for the part of over is the integral of over a symmetric annulus, hence is zero. The remaining integral is absolutely convergent because has compact support and there. Letting in [F2] gives
By 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3, for every and every , where for , for and for , one has . Since , the symmetric principal value exists at every and equals ; this proves assertion 1.
The function is supported in by 1.2, so for and one has ; hence as by 2.4.
Since on , the same symmetric cancellation shows that for every , . This outer integral is absolutely convergent because has compact support and its denominator is bounded away from zero. By 3.1 its value is .
Combining 2.5, 3.2 and 4.1, for every fixed .
By 2.4, in ; by [F10] a subsequence converges almost everywhere to a representative of the class , while 5.1 makes that same subsequence converge to at every point of the full-measure set . Therefore almost everywhere: represents the multiplier extension of , which is assertion 2.
Depends on
- Truncated Hilbert transform and principal value
- The Hilbert transform is the tempered convolution with pv(1/(pi x)) and has signum Fourier multiplier
- The Hilbert transform is an L2 isometry and squares to minus the identity
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Complex Lp classes and Euclidean test-function conventions
- Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs
- The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump
- A unit-mass smooth bump generates an $L^1$ approximate identity
- Every $L^1$ approximate identity converges to the identity in $L^p$ for $1 \le p < \infty$
- Convolution with a mollifier is smooth, and derivatives pass under the integral sign
- The support of a convolution lies in the closure of the support sumset
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
- The chain rule, in one line from Carathéodory: if $g$ is differentiable at $c$ and $f$ is differentiable at $g(c)$, then $f \circ g$ is differentiable at $c$ with $(f \circ g)'(c) = f'(g(c))\,g'(c)$
- The second fundamental theorem: if $G$ is differentiable on $[a,b]$ with $G' = f$ and $f$ is integrable, then $\int_a^b f = G(b)-G(a)$
- For $a<c<b$: $f$ is integrable on $[a,b]$ if and only if it is integrable on $[a,c]$ and on $[c,b]$, and then $\int_a^b f = \int_a^c f + \int_c^b f$; with the oriented form for arbitrary $a,b,c$
- Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences
Used by
- Hilbert transform does not map L-infinity to L-infinity Counterexample
- Hilbert transform is not strong type (1,1) Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
110 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis, third edition (standard reference, not scraped)