How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Walsh–Hadamard encoding and relative Hamming distance
Definition
For and , the Walsh–Hadamard encoding is the truth table of the linear function on , with coordinates indexed in lexicographic order by . Thus the table has length , including the one-entry table when . Its entry at a unit vector is .
For two tables with the same nonempty finite coordinate set , their relative Hamming distance is For Walsh–Hadamard tables of dimension , and the denominator is . In particular the table has a well-defined relative distance. The linear functions and their truth-table convention are those of The BLR linearity test over F_2, and the coordinates are the cube variables used by Hadamard linearity constraint system.
Depends on
Used by
- Quadratic equations and tensor-code oracle tables Definition
- Shared codeword blocks and edge acceptance circuits Definition
- Two-piece PCP of proximity and concatenation check Definition
- A single equality edge through robust composition Example
- Four coordinates of a Walsh–Hadamard codeword Example
- Concatenation testing enforces the same decoded prefix Lemma
- Distinct Walsh–Hadamard words differ on half the cube Lemma
- Tensor consistency rejects a wrong decoded tensor Lemma
- The BLR test supplies a nearby unique linear decoder Lemma
- A two-piece constant-query PCP of proximity Theorem
- An exponential-length constant-query PCP for quadratic equations Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Irit Dinur, The PCP Theorem by Gap Amplification (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sanjeev Arora and Boaz Barak, Computational Complexity: A Modern Approach (standard reference, not scraped)