How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A closed uncomplemented subspace
Example
Assuming , the inclusion is a concrete closed subspace that is not complemented.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard inclusion .
is closed in (c_0 is a closed subspace of ell-infinity).
is not complemented in under (c_0 is not complemented in ell-infinity).
Verification
The inclusion in the statement is a closed-subspace inclusion by [F1].
It is uncomplemented by [F2], so it has both advertised properties.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Piotr Hajlasz, Functional Analysis, Theorem 10.19 (standard reference, not scraped)