How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
c_0 is not complemented in ell-infinity
Statement
Assuming , the closed subspace is not complemented in .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The quotient map .
Under , has no countable separating family (The quotient ell-infinity/c_0 has no countable separating family).
Proof
Suppose a bounded projection exists. For each coordinate , define . This is well defined because for , and it is a bounded functional on the quotient.
If for every , then coordinatewise, so and . Thus is a countable separating family.
This contradicts [F1]. Hence no such projection exists, and is not complemented.
Depends on
- The sequence spaces c_0 and ell-infinity
- c_0 is a closed subspace of ell-infinity
- The quotient ell-infinity/c_0 has no countable separating family
- A complemented closed subspace of a normed space
- A closed subspace is complemented exactly when it is the range of a bounded projection
- The quotient seminorm \(\|x+M\|_{X/M}=\inf_{m\in M}\|x+m\|=\operatorname{dist}(x,M)\)
Used by
- A closed uncomplemented subspace Example
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Piotr Hajlasz, Functional Analysis, Theorem 10.19 (standard reference, not scraped)