Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-09-23 (Codex)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A compactly supported cutoff of an incomplete vector field is complete

Example

Choose a smooth bump function χ:R→[0,1] with χ=1 on [−1,1] and supp⁡χ⊆[−2,2]. Then

Y=χ(x)x2∂∂x

agrees with the incomplete field x2 d/dx near the origin but is complete.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bump function χ equal to 1 on [−1,1] and supported in [−2,2].

[L1]

Smooth bump functions with prescribed compact support exist (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[L2]

A Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has a unique maximal solution (Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval).

[L5]

A solution with a sequence of graph points in a compact interior region approaching a finite endpoint extends beyond that endpoint (A solution whose graph approaches a compact interior region at a finite endpoint extends past that endpoint).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1L1L3L4given

Apply [L1] to [−1,1]⊂(−2,2) to obtain the required smooth bump. Put f(x)=χ(x)x2. It is smooth, equals x2 on [−1,1], and vanishes off [−2,2]. Hence ∣f∣≤4. Its derivative is continuous and zero off [−2,2], so [L4] bounds ∣f′∣ globally. By [L3], f is Lipschitz.

2.1L2L3L4L5step 1.1

Fix any initial value x(0)=a and take its maximal solution x:(α,β)→R from [L2]. Since ∣x′∣=∣f(x)∣≤4, [L3] on the interval between 0 and t gives ∣x(t)−a∣≤4∣t∣. If β<∞, set tj=β(1−1/(j+1)) for j≥1. These times increase to β, and the graph points lie in the compact rectangle [0,β]×[−R,R], where R=∣a∣+4β+1. The ODE domain is all of R2, so [L5] extends the solution past β, contrary to maximality. Therefore β=∞. Reflecting time applies the same argument to −f and gives α=−∞. This uses an explicitly defined sequence and no choice assumption.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Every integral curve of Y is thus global, so Y is complete. In contrast, x(t)=1/(1−t) solves x′=x2 with x(0)=1 for t<1 and diverges as t↑1, so the original field is incomplete. This verifies both the local agreement and the claimed change in completeness.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources