Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-04
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compactly supported smooth vector fields are complete

Statement

Every compactly supported smooth vector field on a smooth manifold is complete.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth vector field X on M with compact support K.

[L1]

A vector field is complete if and only if its maximal flow is global (A vector field is complete if and only if its flow is global).

[L2]

The maximal flow exists on an open domain and its time slices are the maximal integral curves (The fundamental theorem on flows).

[L3]

The support of a section is the closure of the set where it is nonzero (Smooth sections, local sections, and support).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let γ:IM be a maximal integral curve of X through some point p. If γ(t0)K for some t0I, then Xγ(t0)=0 by [L3], so the constant curve through γ(t0) is an integral curve of X. Uniqueness therefore forces γ to be constant on the connected component of {tI:γ(t)K} containing t0. Thus every nonconstant part of γ lies in K.

L3given
2.1

Suppose I had a finite right endpoint b. Choose times tnb. If infinitely many γ(tn) lie in K, compactness of K gives a subsequence converging to some qK. Otherwise γ(tn)K for all large n, and step 1.1 makes those tail values constant on a neighbourhood of b; hence γ(tn)q for some qMK.

step 1.1given
3.1

By [L2], there is a local flow through q defined on some interval (ε,ε). For n large, γ(tn) lies in its domain, so uniqueness of integral curves extends γ past b by flowing forward from γ(tn) for time larger than btn. This contradicts maximality.

L2step 2.1
4.1

The same argument excludes a finite left endpoint. Therefore every maximal integral curve is defined on all of R, and [L1] implies that X is complete.

L1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources