Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A leafwise positive closed two-form calibrates a taut foliation

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω. Let M be a closed oriented 3-manifold, let F be a co-oriented codimension-one foliation of M (oriented by the rule that the leaf orientation followed by the co-orientation is the orientation of M), and let θ be a closed 2-form on M positive on TF: θp(v,w)>0 for every positively oriented basis (v,w) of TpF. Then F is taut. Moreover there is a smooth Riemannian metric making ker⁡θ orthogonal to TF, for which θ has comass one and restricts to each leaf's area form. Thus it calibrates every leaf and every leaf is minimal for that metric.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed oriented three-manifold M with a co-oriented codimension-one foliation F and a closed 2-form θ positive on the leaves.

[F1]

A transversely oriented foliation of a compact manifold is taut if and only if it has no dead-end component; a dead-end component N has compact closure whose boundary is a finite union of compact leaves, with the co-orientation pointing inwards along every boundary leaf (A foliation is taut if and only if it has no dead-end component, Dead-end components, Taut codimension-one foliations).

[F2]

The orientation of a leaf induced from the co-orientation and the ambient orientation, and the outward-normal-first induced boundary orientation of a manifold with boundary, are independent of the chosen outward vector field (Orientation induced on a hypersurface by a coorientation, Induced boundary orientation, Boundary orientation is independent of the outward vector field).

[F3]

Stokes' theorem relates the integral of the exterior derivative over an oriented compact manifold with boundary to the boundary integral (The general Stokes theorem), integration over an oriented embedded submanifold is defined leafwise (Integration on an oriented embedded submanifold), and a positive top form with compact support on an oriented manifold has positive integral (Positivity of the oriented integral, Positive volume form on an oriented manifold).

[F4]

Smooth bundle metrics exist; a normal compactly supported variation has first derivative of area −2∫⟨V,H⟩, where H is averaged mean curvature (Every smooth vector bundle admits a smooth bundle metric, First variation of volume for a normal variation, Mean curvature vector). Compactly supported ambient fields have flows (Compactly supported smooth vector fields are complete), and compact source sets have bumps (A manifold bump for a compact set inside an open set).

[F5]

The standing assumption is Countable Choice ACω as recorded for this pair (The countable-choice principle used in the foliation pair).

Proof technique: direct.

Proof

1.1F1given

Suppose F is not taut. By [F1] there is a dead-end component N whose closure N‾ is a compact oriented three-manifold with boundary a finite union of compact leaves Li along which the co-orientation points inwards.

1.2F4givenconstructalgebra

Positivity on TF makes θ a rank-two form everywhere. Its kernel K is a smooth line bundle transverse to TF: if a nonzero tangent vector of a leaf lay in K, its contraction with the positive area form θ∣TF would not vanish. Choose a smooth metric h on TF by F4 and write θ∣TF=a μh with smooth a>0. In dimension two the metric ah has area form aμh. Give K any smooth metric and declare TF⊥K, obtaining a smooth ambient metric. Since θ annihilates K and equals the unit area form on TF, its value on any unit simple two-vector has absolute value at most one, by the determinant bound for orthogonal projection onto the two-plane TF. Equality holds on the oriented unit leaf tangent bivector. This explicitly proves the comass-one calibration assertion; an arbitrary previously chosen transverse line would not have eliminated mixed components of θ.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Stokes gives ∑i±∫Liθ=∫N‾dθ=0, because θ is closed. Each boundary leaf carries the orientation induced from the co-orientation and the orientation of M by [F2]; since the co-orientation points inwards on every boundary component, all signs in the sum coincide, so all integrals ∫Liθ have the same sign. Each integral is nonzero because θ∣Li is a positive area form on the compact leaf Li by the positivity hypothesis, so by [F3] every integral is strictly positive for the induced orientation. Hence the sum cannot vanish, a contradiction; therefore no dead-end component exists and F is taut.

2.2F3F4step 1.2construct

Let D be a compact smooth domain in a leaf and vary its immersion by a compactly supported ambient normal field that vanishes near ∂D. Stokes applied to the homotopy cylinder gives ∫DFt∗θ=∫DF0∗θ, because dθ=0 and the cylinder's side is fixed. The comass bound from step 1.2 gives Area⁡(Ft∣D)≥∫DFt∗θ=Area⁡(F0∣D) for both signs of small t. Hence its first derivative is zero. By F4, ∫D⟨V,H⟩=0 for every such normal variation. Locally extend V=ηH, with any nonnegative bump η supported in a small embedded leaf chart, to a compactly supported ambient normal field; F4 supplies the flow realizing it. Then ∫η∣H∣2=0, so continuity and arbitrary bumps imply H=0 everywhere. This proves minimality for every leaf, including noncompact leaves, without importing a calibration-to-minimality theorem.

3.1F2F4F5step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2∎

Combining the preceding steps, a closed 2-form positive on the leaves forces tautness and calibrates the foliation, with every leaf minimal; the argument uses one Stokes computation and finitely many local metric choices, hence only the standing countable choice from [F5].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Taut codimension-one foliations.

Dependency tree · two levels

83 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources