Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

First variation of volume for a normal variation

Statement

Assume ACω. Let Mm be a smooth manifold of dimension m1, let (M,g) be Riemannian, and let

F:(ε,ε)×MM

be smooth with every Ft:=F(t,) an immersion. Put f=F0, gt=Ftg, and V(p)=dF(0,p)(t). Suppose that V is normal to df(TM) and has compact support. If KM is a compact smooth domain satisfying suppVintMK, define

AK(t):=Volgt(K)=Kμgt.

Then, for the averaged mean-curvature vector Hf,

AK(0)=mKg(V,Hf)μg=mMg(V,Hf)μg.

The derivative is independent of the eligible domain K. If M is compact, one may take K=M, obtaining the first variation of total volume. The choice hypothesis is inherited exactly through the normal projections and density integration.

If M is boundaryless, the same integral formula holds without the normality hypothesis on V: since Hf is normal, the integrand automatically sees only V. Thus in the boundaryless case vanishing mean curvature implies stationarity under every compactly supported variation, not merely the normal ones.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the stated smooth family of immersions, normal compactly supported variation field V, and eligible compact domain K.

[F1]

The immersion normal bundle and second fundamental form are well defined, and mHf=trgIIf. Mean curvature vector.

[F2]

Each pullback gt=Ftg is a smooth positive-definite metric because Ft is an immersion. Pullback of a riemannian metric is riemannian exactly for immersions.

[F3]

In coordinates the Riemannian density is detG(t)dx1dxm. Riemannian volume density.

[F4]

On the invertible locus, Jacobi's formula is Ddet(G)[G˙]=det(G)tr(G1G˙). The determinant differential is Ddet(A)[H]=tr(adj(A)H) at every matrix, and Jacobi's formula holds on the invertible locus.

[F5]

The ambient Levi–Civita connection is metric compatible and torsion free; in coordinate frames the latter is symmetry of the Christoffel symbols. Levi civita connection, Torsion free is equivalent to symmetric christoffel symbols in coordinate frames.

[F6]

Every immersion is locally an embedding, and on each such neighbourhood the Weingarten identity gives g(XV,df(Y))=g(V,IIf(X,Y)) for normal V. Every immersion is locally an embedding, Weingarten equation and adjointness of the shape operator.

[F7]

A parameter derivative dominated by one integrable function may pass through an integral. Differentiation under the integral sign.

[F8]

Under countable choice, compactly supported smooth Riemannian densities have intrinsic, orientation-free integrals, including on manifolds with boundary. Riemannian volume of a compactly supported smooth density.

[F9]

On a boundaryless smooth manifold, a compactly supported smooth tangent field is complete, and its time maps are diffeomorphisms with inverse time maps. Compactly supported smooth vector fields are complete, Time-t flow maps are diffeomorphisms between open domains.

[F10]

Intrinsic density integration is invariant under diffeomorphisms. Orientation-free density integration and its properties.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Fix pM and extend a g-orthonormal basis (e1,,em) of TpM to local fields on M, lifted independently of t to the product. Write Ei(t)=dFt(ei) and Gij(t)=g(Ei(t),Ej(t)). In ambient coordinates, equality of mixed partials and the symmetric Christoffel symbols in [F5] give DtEit=0=Dei(dF(t))t=0=eiV.

F2F5givenalgebra
2.1

Metric compatibility and step 1.1 give G˙ij(0)=g(eiV,ej)+g(ei,ejV). At p, G(0)=I. Applying [F3]–[F4] therefore yields the pointwise density derivative ddt0μgt=12tr(G˙(0))μg=i=1mg(eiV,ei)μg.

F3F4F5step 1.1algebra
3.1

Because V is normal, [F6] converts each summand in step 2.1 to g(V,IIf(ei,ei)). The trace formula [F1] now gives the global density identity ddt0μgt=g ⁣(V,iIIf(ei,ei))μg=mg(V,Hf)μg. Both sides are intrinsic, so the pointwise calculation in an arbitrary orthonormal basis patches over M.

F1F6step 2.1algebra
4.1

Write μgt=J(t,p)μg on K. By [F2]–[F3], J is smooth and positive near {0}×K. Compactness supplies a closed parameter interval on which tJ is bounded; the constant bound is integrable because [F8] gives K finite volume. Thus [F7] passes the derivative through the fixed-domain integral, and step 3.1 gives AK(0)=KtJ(0,p)μg=mKg(V,Hf)μg.

F2F3F7F8step 3.1
5.1

The last integrand in step 4.1 vanishes outside suppV, which lies in intMK. Its extension by zero is therefore a smooth compactly supported density on M, and locality of the intrinsic integral in [F8] gives Kg(V,Hf)μg=Mg(V,Hf)μg. The same equality holds for every eligible K, proving domain independence.

F8step 4.1given
6.1

Now assume M is boundaryless and drop the normality hypothesis. Decompose V=V+V. The tangent field corresponding to V is compactly supported inside intMK, so [F9] supplies its flow ϕt, with ϕt equal to the identity near K. Put F~t=Ftϕt1. Its variation field is Vdf(V)=V, while ϕt(K)=K and [F10] gives VolF~tg(K)=VolFtg(K). Applying steps 3.1–5.1 to F~ proves the same formula for the original variation, since g(V,Hf)=g(V,Hf).

F1F9F10step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra
6.2

If M is compact, it is itself an eligible compact domain (its interior relative to itself is M), so step 5.1 gives the total-volume formula.

step 5.1given
7.1

For empty M (of fixed positive dimension), both integrals and the derivative are zero. Dimension zero is excluded because the averaged vector contains 1/m; in dimension one the proof is the single diagonal Gram calculation. A zero variation field gives zero pointwise. Immersivity in [F2] excludes a degenerate pullback metric. The parameter value 0 is interior to (ε,ε), and the density argument applies to the boundary of K without orientation or integration by parts. The all-variation clause is restricted to boundaryless M because [F9]'s two-sided reparametrizing flow need not exist for a field transverse to a manifold boundary. The stated ACω is inherited through [F1], [F6], and [F8]; [F9]–[F10], the pointwise finite-basis calculation, and one compactness bound add no choice.

F1F2F6F8F9F10step 1.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1step 6.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

57 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources