Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Orientation-free density integration and its properties

Statement

Compactly supported smooth density integration is independent of charts and partition, linear, local, nonnegative on nonnegative densities and strictly positive for a nonzero nonnegative density. It is invariant under every diffeomorphism, without choosing an orientation. The finite-parametrization formula holds under the hypotheses of Computing form integrals by finite parametrizations, with orientation preservation omitted and absolute Jacobians used.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Integral of a compactly supported smooth density: Assume ACω. Let δ be a compactly supported smooth density on Mn, with boundary allowed. Choose a chart partition (ρi) and write ρiδ=fidxi. For n1 define Mδ=iRnf~i(xi)dxi. The zero extensions are Riemann integrable, including at genuine faces, by lem-chart-supported-coefficients-have-well-defined-riemann-integrable-half-space-extensions. The compact-support/local-finiteness argument of lem-a-locally-finite-sum-is-finite-near-the-compact-support-of-a-form applies to density supports as closed sets, so the sum is finite. For n=0 sum the scalar density values over the finite support, without orientation signs. Empty support gives zero. Choice independence is discharged by thm-density-integration-is-defined-without-an-orientation.

[F2]

Pullback of densities by local diffeomorphisms: For a local diffeomorphism F:MnNn, pullback of smooth densities is smooth and in coordinates satisfies F(fdy)=(fF)detDFdx. It is real-linear, obeys F(aδ)=(aF)Fδ for smooth functions a on N, and (FG)=GF for composable local diffeomorphisms.

[F3]

Coordinate independence of chart integrals: On an oriented smooth n-manifold, including n=0 and genuine boundary, a smooth top form with compact support contained in two connected charts has the same signed chart integral in both charts.

[F4]

Local finiteness near compact support: If (Ci)iI is a locally finite family of closed subsets of a manifold and K is compact, only finitely many Ci meet K. There is an open neighborhood of K disjoint from all the other Ci. In particular, for a smooth partition of unity (ρi) and ωΩck(M), only finitely many ρiω are nonzero.

[F5]

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm: Let Q=j<m[aj,bj] be nondegenerate. For integrable f,g:QR and scalars α,β, the function αf+βg is integrable and its integral is αQf+βQg. If fg, then QfQg. Also f is integrable and QfQf. If ar<c<br, cutting Q at the coordinate hyperplane xr=c gives two nondegenerate subrectangles; integrability on Q is equivalent to integrability on both restrictions, and their integral values add to the integral over Q.

[F6]

Computing form integrals by finite parametrizations: Let n1, let Mn be oriented, and let ωΩcn(M). For 1im let DiRn be bounded open Jordan domains and Fi:DiM continuous and smooth up to the boundary in target coordinates: near each parameter point, a target coordinate representative extends smoothly to a Euclidean neighborhood. Suppose FiDi is an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism onto an open WiM, the Wi are pairwise disjoint, and suppωiWi. Then Mω=i=1mDiFiω. An empty family is allowed when the support is empty. No nonsingularity of DFi on Di, and no M-valued extension across a genuine target boundary, is assumed.

Proof

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement above.

1.1

For a coordinate transition G, the coefficient law is fx=(fyG)detDG. On its local Euclidean extension neighborhoods, precisely the zero-extension change-of-variables argument used to prove chart independence of form integrals applies. The absolute determinant is already present, so no sign is inserted. This gives equality of each chart-supported density integral even at genuine faces.

F2F3
2.1

For two partitions (ρi) and (τj) near the compact support, all relevant sums are finite. Expand each original sum using the products ρiτj; each product is chart-supported and has the same integral in either chart by the previous step. Both sums equal the same double sum. Restricting the charts to an open neighborhood of the support proves locality.

F1F4step 1.1
3.1

A common partition and Riemann linearity prove linearity. Nonnegative coefficients give nonnegative chart integrals. For a nonzero nonnegative density some weighted coefficient is positive at a point, hence bounded below by a positive constant on a small positive-volume rectangle inside a ball or half-ball. Its integral is positive by monotonicity and all remaining summands are nonnegative.

F5step 2.1
3.2

If F:MN is a diffeomorphism, the pullback support is the compact inverse image of the target support. Pull back a target chart partition. The coordinate change equality in the first step identifies corresponding integrals, and summation proves invariance. This uses no sign assumption on F.

F2step 1.1step 2.1
3.3

For finite parametrizations, repeat the null-boundary and compact-interior exhaustion argument in the proof of the cited parametrization result. Its boundary-image estimates are orientation-free. In a target chart a density coefficient is an ordinary smooth real function, and the substitution on each nonsingular compact interior piece uses detDFi; the bounded parameter coefficients and null image collars make the omitted errors tend to zero exactly as there. Thus summing gives Mδ=iDiFiδ. This is an adaptation of that proof, not an application of an oriented-manifold conclusion to a nonorientable manifold.

F2F6step 2.1
4.1

In dimension zero all assertions except the positive-dimensional parametrization statement follow from a finite unsigned sum of scalar coefficients. Empty support and the zero density have value zero; a singleton has its scalar value. This completes the stated cases.

F1step 3.1step 3.2

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Integral of a compactly supported smooth density.

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources