How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Increasing reparametrization of finitely many critical levels
Statement
Assume . Let and . There is a smooth diffeomorphism with , equal to the identity near both endpoints, and for every . It may additionally be chosen to have derivative one near every ; there it is translation by .
Facts & Assumptions
A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set gives nonnegative smooth bumps supported inside an open interval, positive on a smaller closed interval.
Proof
Given: The two strictly increasing finite sequences.
Adjoin nodes and . Choose small disjoint neighbourhoods of all source nodes. Construct a positive smooth function equal to one on smaller node neighbourhoods and equal to a small constant off the chosen neighbourhoods, interpolating by scalar cutoffs from [F1]. The neighbourhoods and may be chosen so small that for every , : there are finitely many positive target gaps, and the integrals are bounded by the total lengths of the node neighbourhoods plus .
In each choose a nonnegative smooth bump supported away from the node neighbourhoods and with integral one, by normalizing a bump positive on a smaller interval. Set and . Then , near every node, and its integral over each source interval is exactly its target gap. Summing these identities gives , and .
Thus and is a bijection of the closed interval; the inverse is smooth by the one-variable inverse function theorem, including at endpoints by the identity there. Near each node its derivative is one, hence it is translation by . All selections were finite and the construction uses no choice principle. The empty list uses the identity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.