How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A six-vertex witness graph makes the Bird criterion explicit
Example
The six-vertex graph
has a homogeneous clique , so has the Erdős-Hajnal property; moreover and are both co-Bird.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The graph above, with distinguished vertices and .
Every graph on at most five vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property (Every graph on at most five vertices has the Erdős-Hajnal property).
Substitution preserves the Erdős-Hajnal property (Alon–Pach–Solymosi: if and have the Erdős–Hajnal property, so does the graph obtained from by substituting for a vertex).
The graph adds a new vertex adjacent to the two distinguished vertices, while does the same after deleting the distinguished edge if it is present; co-Bird is the complement of Bird (The graphs and for two distinguished vertices, The Bird graph and co-Bird).
Verification
Outside the pair , both vertices are adjacent exactly to and are nonadjacent to . Hence is a homogeneous clique. Let be the graph on with edges . Replacing by the clique recovers all edges of , so .
In , delete . The remaining six vertices have edge set . Relabel them by , , , , , and . Again the only missing edges are , so is also co-Bird.
The graphs and both have at most five vertices, so [L1] gives the Erdős-Hajnal property for each. By [L2], also has the Erdős-Hajnal property.
In , delete . The remaining six vertices have edge set . Relabel them by , , , , , and . Then the only missing edges are , which are exactly the Bird edges. Therefore is co-Bird.
Steps 2.1-3.1 together with step 1.2 verify the finite witness data used in the Bird route: has the Erdős-Hajnal property, and both and contain induced co-Bird subgraphs.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Figure 6 and Lemma 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)