How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The -graph sits inside a one-subdivided star and deletes to the five-vertex path
Example
The -graph occurs as an induced subgraph of the -subdivision of , and deleting the remaining pendant leaf recovers the five-vertex path.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The -subdivision of with center , subdivision vertices , and leaves .
The path has five vertices in one chain and no other edges (Empty and complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, and the convention that and have vertices).
Verification
On the six-vertex subset , the induced edges are , , , , and . Relabelling , , , , , and turns this induced subgraph into the edge set from [L1]. Hence the selected subset is an induced copy of the -graph.
Deleting the vertex from that induced copy leaves the five vertices with exactly the four path edges . By [L2], this is .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Shenwei Huang, Yiao Ju, and Yidong Zhou, Erdős-Hajnal beyond the five-vertex path, Lemma 2.2 (standard reference, not scraped)