How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A small-cancellation presentation gives a hyperbolic group
Example
Consider the one-relator presentation
This is a finite presentation and hence defines a hyperbolic group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed presentation of .
In the single relator , no nonempty subword occurs as an initial segment of two distinct cyclic conjugates or inverse cyclic conjugates, so the symmetrized presentation has no nontrivial pieces and therefore satisfies vacuously.
Finite presentations define hyperbolic groups (Finite C'(1/6) presentations define hyperbolic groups).
Verification
By [A1], the displayed finite presentation satisfies the condition.
Therefore [L1] shows that the presented group is hyperbolic.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
2 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An introduction to combinatorial and geometric group theory, Section 3.5 (standard reference, not scraped)