How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A small-cancellation presentation gives a hyperbolic group
Example
Consider the one-relator presentation
This is a finite presentation and hence defines a hyperbolic group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed presentation of .
In the single relator , no nonempty subword occurs as an initial segment of two distinct cyclic conjugates or inverse cyclic conjugates, so the symmetrized presentation has no nontrivial pieces and therefore satisfies vacuously.
A presentation is the quotient of the free group by the normal closure of its relators (Group presentation by generators and relations).
Every finite-rank free group is hyperbolic (Finite groups and free groups are hyperbolic).
Verification
By [A1], the displayed finite presentation satisfies the condition.
The relator gives in , so the first six generators generate . The natural map is therefore onto. Conversely send to the identically named free generator for and send to . The relator maps to , so [F1] factors this assignment through a homomorphism . The two composites fix every respective generator, hence are identities. Thus .
By [L1], is hyperbolic, and the explicit isomorphism in step 1.2 transfers its Cayley tree to with the corresponding generating set. Hence this finite presentation defines a hyperbolic group, without importing the general linear-isoperimetric theorem.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Nicholas Touikan, An introduction to combinatorial and geometric group theory, Section 3.5 (standard reference, not scraped)