Alphabeta Math
Session-authored (Fable 5 assisted)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

7 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Hyperbolic Spaces and Hyperbolic Groups — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples and counterexamples anchor the page’s main geometry: trees and the hyperbolic plane as model spaces, free and surface groups as standard hyperbolic groups, a concrete small-cancellation witness, and the square grid as the canonical obstruction to hyperbolicity.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Every tree is 0-hyperbolic

Example

Every tree is 0-hyperbolic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A tree T.

[L1]

Cayley trees are 0-hyperbolic (Cayley trees are 0-hyperbolic).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The proposition [L1] states exactly that every tree is 0-hyperbolic.

L1
2.1

Therefore T is a model example of a hyperbolic space with the best possible constant δ=0.

step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic

Example

The hyperbolic plane H2 is a hyperbolic geodesic metric space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard geodesic metric on H2.

[A1]

Classical hyperbolic geometry gives a uniform slimness constant for geodesic triangles in H2.

[L1]

A geodesic metric space is hyperbolic exactly when all geodesic triangles are δ-slim for some δ0 (Delta-slim triangles and hyperbolic spaces).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [A1], geodesic triangles in H2 are uniformly slim.

givenA1
2.1

Therefore [L1] shows that H2 is hyperbolic.

L1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Free groups have Cantor-set boundaries

Example

If Fr is a free group of rank r2, then its Gromov boundary is a Cantor set.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A free group Fr of rank r2.

[L1]

Free groups are hyperbolic (Finite groups and free groups are hyperbolic).

[A1]

The boundary of a regular tree of valence at least 3 is homeomorphic to a Cantor set.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], the Cayley graph of Fr with respect to a free basis is a hyperbolic tree.

L1
2.1

Because r2, that tree has valence at least 3, so [A1] identifies its boundary with a Cantor set. Hence the boundary of Fr is a Cantor set.

A1step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Closed surface groups are hyperbolic

Example

The fundamental group of a closed hyperbolic surface is a hyperbolic group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A closed hyperbolic surface Σ and its fundamental group π1(Σ).

[L1]

The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic (The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic).

[L2]

The Švarc-Milnor lemma transfers geometric actions on proper geodesic spaces to quasi-isometries with finitely generated groups (The Svarc-Milnor lemma).

[L3]

Hyperbolicity is invariant under quasi-isometry (Hyperbolicity is a quasi-isometry invariant of geodesic spaces).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The group π1(Σ) acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly by deck transformations on the universal cover H2 of Σ.

given
2.1

By [L2], π1(Σ) is quasi-isometric to H2, and [L1] shows that H2 is hyperbolic. Therefore [L3] makes π1(Σ) hyperbolic.

L1L2L3step 1.1
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A small-cancellation presentation gives a hyperbolic group

Example

Consider the one-relator presentation

G=x1,x2,x3,x4,x5,x6,x7x1x2x3x4x5x6x7.

This is a finite C(1/6) presentation and hence defines a hyperbolic group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The displayed presentation of G.

[A1]

In the single relator x1x2x3x4x5x6x7, no nonempty subword occurs as an initial segment of two distinct cyclic conjugates or inverse cyclic conjugates, so the symmetrized presentation has no nontrivial pieces and therefore satisfies C(1/6) vacuously.

[L1]

Finite C(1/6) presentations define hyperbolic groups (Finite C'(1/6) presentations define hyperbolic groups).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

By [A1], the displayed finite presentation satisfies the C(1/6) condition.

givenA1
2.1

Therefore [L1] shows that the presented group G is hyperbolic.

L1step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

Z^2 is not hyperbolic

Statement refuted

The page proves that not every finitely generated group is hyperbolic; the standard witness is Z2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The free abelian group Z2.

[L1]

Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic (Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The group Z2 is free abelian of rank 2.

given
2.1

Therefore [L1] shows that Z2 is not hyperbolic, providing the required counterexample.

L1step 1.1
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-27Open item page →

A product of two infinite groups need not be hyperbolic

Statement refuted

The product of two infinite groups need not be hyperbolic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The direct product Z×Z.

[L1]

Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic (Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The group Z×Z is a direct product of two infinite groups and is free abelian of rank 2.

given
2.1

Therefore [L1] shows that Z×Z is not hyperbolic. So the general claim fails.

L1step 1.1

Sources