How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hyperbolic Spaces and Hyperbolic Groups — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cayley Graphs, Word Metrics and Quasi-Isometry
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Geometric Actions Svarc Milnor and Growth
- Graphs, Walks and Connectivity
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hyperbolic Spaces and Hyperbolic Groups
- Metric Spaces
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Suprema and Infima
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
2 · Summary
These examples and counterexamples anchor the page’s main geometry: trees and the hyperbolic plane as model spaces, free and surface groups as standard hyperbolic groups, a concrete small-cancellation witness, and the square grid as the canonical obstruction to hyperbolicity.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Every tree is 0-hyperbolic
Example
Every tree is -hyperbolic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A tree .
Cayley trees are -hyperbolic (Cayley trees are 0-hyperbolic).
Verification
The proposition [L1] states exactly that every tree is -hyperbolic.
Therefore is a model example of a hyperbolic space with the best possible constant .
The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic
Example
The hyperbolic plane is a hyperbolic geodesic metric space.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard geodesic metric on .
Classical hyperbolic geometry gives a uniform slimness constant for geodesic triangles in .
A geodesic metric space is hyperbolic exactly when all geodesic triangles are -slim for some (Delta-slim triangles and hyperbolic spaces).
Verification
By [A1], geodesic triangles in are uniformly slim.
Therefore [L1] shows that is hyperbolic.
Free groups have Cantor-set boundaries
Example
If is a free group of rank , then its Gromov boundary is a Cantor set.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A free group of rank .
Free groups are hyperbolic (Finite groups and free groups are hyperbolic).
The boundary of a regular tree of valence at least is homeomorphic to a Cantor set.
Verification
By [L1], the Cayley graph of with respect to a free basis is a hyperbolic tree.
Because , that tree has valence at least , so [A1] identifies its boundary with a Cantor set. Hence the boundary of is a Cantor set.
Closed surface groups are hyperbolic
Example
The fundamental group of a closed hyperbolic surface is a hyperbolic group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A closed hyperbolic surface and its fundamental group .
The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic (The hyperbolic plane is hyperbolic).
The Švarc-Milnor lemma transfers geometric actions on proper geodesic spaces to quasi-isometries with finitely generated groups (The Svarc-Milnor lemma).
Hyperbolicity is invariant under quasi-isometry (Hyperbolicity is a quasi-isometry invariant of geodesic spaces).
Verification
The group acts properly discontinuously and cocompactly by deck transformations on the universal cover of .
By [L2], is quasi-isometric to , and [L1] shows that is hyperbolic. Therefore [L3] makes hyperbolic.
A small-cancellation presentation gives a hyperbolic group
Example
Consider the one-relator presentation
This is a finite presentation and hence defines a hyperbolic group.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The displayed presentation of .
In the single relator , no nonempty subword occurs as an initial segment of two distinct cyclic conjugates or inverse cyclic conjugates, so the symmetrized presentation has no nontrivial pieces and therefore satisfies vacuously.
Finite presentations define hyperbolic groups (Finite C'(1/6) presentations define hyperbolic groups).
Verification
By [A1], the displayed finite presentation satisfies the condition.
Therefore [L1] shows that the presented group is hyperbolic.
Z^2 is not hyperbolic
Statement refuted
The page proves that not every finitely generated group is hyperbolic; the standard witness is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The free abelian group .
Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic (Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic).
Counterexample
The group is free abelian of rank .
Therefore [L1] shows that is not hyperbolic, providing the required counterexample.
A product of two infinite groups need not be hyperbolic
Statement refuted
The product of two infinite groups need not be hyperbolic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The direct product .
Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic (Free abelian groups of rank at least two are not hyperbolic).
Counterexample
The group is a direct product of two infinite groups and is free abelian of rank .
Therefore [L1] shows that is not hyperbolic. So the general claim fails.
Sources
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Section 6.2.4
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Section 6.2.1
- Brian H. Bowditch, A course on geometric group theory, Section 5.3
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Sections 4.4 and 6.3
- Nicholas Touikan, An introduction to combinatorial and geometric group theory, Section 3.5
- Clara Löh, Geometric Group Theory, Section 6.5.4