How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A two-crossing closed braid factorization complex
Example
For a braid diagram with two crossings, is the iteration of two crossing complexes and the intermediate arc factors; for instance on three strands has over the shared polynomial ring, with one arc factor for each arc of the diagram. Verify that the total potential is over the boundary points before closure and that for the closed braid diagram (empty boundary) the total potential is , so each outer term of is a genuine two-periodic complex of bigraded -modules; exhibit the four resolutions of the two crossings, each a tensor product of the two local crossing resolutions and all unchanged arc factorizations, and record the induced differentials and their bidegrees. The trigraded cohomology is then computed from the induced differential on the termwise cohomology .
Caveat: the displayed total complex is a representative in up to contractible summands; no invariance statement is made in this example (that is the link-invariance theorem proved later on this page).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the closed braid diagram of on three strands with its two crossings , the intermediate and external arcs, at least one mark on every internal edge, and the labels at the marks and boundary points.
is the tensor product of the crossing complexes and the arc factors over the polynomial ring generated by and all labels; its outer crossing differential has Koszul signs and bidegree and squares to zero, while its inner factorization differential has square the sum of the local potentials (The Khovanov-Rozansky complex and trigraded braid homology).
The crossing complex is the two-term complex for a positive crossing and for a negative crossing, both terms being factorizations with the potential of the four adjacent labels (The positive and negative Khovanov-Rozansky crossing complexes).
Verification
The four resolutions and all signed edges. Write for the resolution with choices at the two positive crossings, including all unchanged arc factors. The outer terms are and zero otherwise. In this summand order the outer differentials are The minus sign comes from the first source factor having cochain degree . Each edge has internal bidegree after the indicated shifts and raises outer degree by . The edge maps commute before the signs, since they act on different tensor factors, so . All four terms retain their inner two-periodic factorization differentials, with the same total potential.
The potential. Before closure, the boundary points of the braid diagram carry labels; every internal label occurs in exactly two local factors with opposite signs, so the sum of the local potentials is over the boundary points, and the square of the inner factorization differential is that element; the outer crossing differential still squares to zero by step 1.1. After closing the braid the closure arcs identify the boundary points in pairs with opposite orientations, so each boundary label occurs once with sign and once with sign ; the total potential is and every outer term of is a genuine two-periodic complex of bigraded -modules.
The induced differential and the cohomology. For each term the termwise cohomology is computed after removing the contractible summands, and commutes with the internal differentials, so it descends to maps ; the four resolutions contribute the four summands of and the induced maps are the sums of the four edge maps of the cube with Koszul signs. The resulting cohomology is the trigraded cohomology of the diagram, and the trigradings of the four summands are inherited from the terms; no invariance statement is made here, and the representative is taken up to contractible summands in .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology II, arXiv:math/0505056v2 (2006), section 1, printed pp. 6-7; published as Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1387-1425 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Khovanov and Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology, arXiv:math/0401268v2, introduction printed pp. 6-12: fixed-n sl(n) analogue with different potentials and gradings, not the parameter-a formulas of KR II (standard reference, not scraped)