How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Khovanov-Rozansky complex and trigraded braid homology
Definition
Let be a finite marked oriented tangle diagram, with at least one mark on every internal edge and every circle, and any finite number of marks (possibly none) on boundary edges. Label all marks and boundary points by variables . For the braid-homology construction specialize to a braid diagram, a generic projection of the closure of a clockwise-oriented braid (The braid group by Artin presentation, The closure of a geometric braid); crossings are resolved as in The positive and negative Khovanov-Rozansky crossing complexes.
Define the tensor product over the polynomial ring generated by and all labels, then restricted to the ring generated by and the boundary labels as in The factorization of a marked MOY graph, viewed as a complex of objects of with over the boundary points; for a closed braid diagram . For a nonempty closed braid diagram , let be the direct sum of the two inner parity cohomologies of , with their parity labels forgotten. It is a bigraded -vector space on which acts trivially; the differential of induces a differential on , and the cohomology of the resulting complex is a triply graded -vector space (cohomological degree , first bigrading and second bigrading ). Its Euler characteristic is
For the zero-strand empty diagram all tensor products are empty: in outer degree and even parity, with zero differential. Its cohomology is , on which acts by multiplication, not trivially. Since , its raw integer-graded Euler series is . This tensor-unit boundary case is distinct from the nonempty-link normalization proved later.
Caveats: the link-invariance results below use braid diagrams only (the oriented IIb move is not used); the marking data are auxiliary, but independence of the marking is proved later on this page; no independence of the diagram is asserted here; the trigrading is kept separate throughout, and records the first bigrading while records the second, in the source's convention.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a marked braid diagram with its crossings, arcs and labels, the local factorizations and the crossing complexes , and the tensor product over the shared polynomial ring.
Each crossing complex is a two-term complex of matrix factorizations with potential , the differential or having bidegree on the shifted terms (The positive and negative Khovanov-Rozansky crossing complexes).
Each local factorization is an object of whose differential squares to its own potential: for an arc with endpoint labels , for a wide edge, and the potential of a marked graph is over its boundary points, vanishing for closed graphs; the empty graph tensor unit is with zero differential (The factorization of a marked MOY graph).
For a nonempty closed graph, row reduction extracts a row . After restricting scalars to , its polynomial splitting reduces cohomology to the remaining Koszul complex at , retaining its odd parity and internal shift; acts trivially on that cohomology (Koszul row operations and variable exclusion preserve homotopy type).
Proof
The tensor product is a complex with the stated potential. The differential of is the sum, with the Koszul signs of the totalization, of the differentials of the factors and . Each is a two-term complex by [F1] and each is a single factorization by [F2], so the totalized differential satisfies strictly, and is an object of . The square of the internal differential of a tensor product accumulates the individual potentials, so that of is over the boundary points: every internal label occurs in exactly two local factors with opposite signs and cancels, exactly as for a marked graph in [F2]. For a closed braid diagram there are no boundary points and the potential is , so is a genuine complex of bigraded -modules.
Termwise cohomology and trivial -action. Every resolution of the nonempty closed braid is a nonempty closed marked graph with at least one linear row: a crossingless circle has a mark and hence an arc factor, while each resolved crossing contributes arc or wide-edge factors. The row reduction of [F3] turns its first linear row into and leaves all other linear and quadratic rows with first entry zero. The explicit polynomial splitting of that first row over reduces its cohomology to the specialization of the remaining Koszul complex, with the first row's parity and internal shift retained. Thus acts trivially on every and these are bigraded -vector spaces. This reduction does not imply finite rank over ; the one-mark circle already leaves the polynomial variable . Each resolution nevertheless has finite-dimensional pieces in each bigrading, since it uses finitely many polynomial variables of positive degrees and finitely many shifted Koszul terms.
The empty boundary case. For the zero-strand diagram there are no crossings or arc factors. The empty tensor is the graph tensor unit of [F2], in degree with zero differential. Thus and all other outer degrees vanish. Its homogeneous monomials have bigrading , so each fixed bidegree is finite and the raw Euler series is . Multiplication by is nonzero, as asserted separately.
The induced differential and the trigraded cohomology. The differential of is a sum of morphisms of bidegree between factorizations, so it commutes with the internal differentials of the terms, hence maps cycles to cycles and boundaries to boundaries in each term and induces a map . Since on by step 1.1, the induced maps satisfy on , and since they preserve the bigrading, the cohomology is triply graded with the cohomological degree and the two bigrading degrees; the Euler characteristic is therefore defined. This is the integer-graded construction of Khovanov-Rozansky II, section 1; invariance is established by later items.
Depends on
Used by
- The normalized graded Euler series of HHH recovers HOMFLYPT Corollary
- The normalized Khovanov-Rozansky HOMFLYPT Euler series Definition
- The reduced Khovanov-Rozansky homology Definition
- A two-crossing closed braid factorization complex Example
- The Khovanov-Rozansky factorization of the unknot Example
- A closed MOY resolution's Koszul complex computes Hochschild homology of its Soergel bimodule Lemma
- Invariance under braid conjugation Lemma
- Oriented kink shifts for braid diagrams Lemma
- The Koszul-Hochschild comparison respects crossing differentials and trigradings Lemma
- HHH is isomorphic to reduced Khovanov-Rozansky homology Theorem
- Invariance under the braid-like Reidemeister IIa move Theorem
- Invariance under the braid-like Reidemeister III move Theorem
- Khovanov-Rozansky homology categorifies the HOMFLYPT polynomial Theorem
- Markings do not change the Khovanov-Rozansky complex Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology II, arXiv:math/0505056v2 (2006), sections 1 and 7, printed pp. 6-10 and 35-36; published as Geom. Topol. 12 (2008) 1387-1425 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Khovanov and Rozansky, Matrix factorizations and link homology, arXiv:math/0401268v2, introduction printed pp. 6-12: fixed-n sl(n) analogue with different potentials and gradings, not the parameter-a formulas of KR II (standard reference, not scraped)
- Tina Kanstrup (notes by Corina Keller and Wai-kit Yeung), Knot homologies and matrix factorizations, ICMS summer school lecture notes (2019), Lecture 3, the triply graded invariant (standard reference, not scraped)