Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The A2 Hall products and their quantum Serre relation

Statement

For the one-arrow quiver 1→2, let S1,S2 be its simples and let I be the nonzero-arrow representation of dimension (1,1). Then [S1]⋆[S2]=ν−1([S1⊕S2]+[I]),[S2]⋆[S1]=[S1⊕S2], and in degree (2,1) the divided-power Serre relation is [S1](2)⋆[S2]−[S1]⋆[S2]⋆[S1]+[S2]⋆[S1](2)=0. Here x(2)=x2/[2]ν! as in Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi.

12a

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k=Fq, ν=q>1, and the quiver above.

[F1]

Its finite-dimensional representation category is a finite-field hereditary Hall category with vertex simples (Finite-dimensional representations of an acyclic quiver form a hereditary finitary Hall category).

[F2]

Hall products count subobjects with quotient on the left and subobject on the right (The untwisted Hall algebra of a finitary abelian category).

[F3]

The untwisted Hall product is associative (The untwisted Hall product is associative and unital).

[F4]

Divided powers use x(n)=xn/[n]ν! (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

Proof

technique · classify arrow ranks and count stable subspaces
1.1F1F3algebra

The acyclic Euler form in [F1] is χ(α,β)=α1β1+α2β2−α1β2; it is bilinear. Twisting the associative Hall product in [F3] by νχ(α,β) remains associative because χ(α,β)+χ(α+β,γ)=χ(β,γ)+χ(α,β+γ). In particular, χ(e1,e2)=−1, χ(e2,e1)=0, and χ(e1,e1)=1.

1.2F1F2F4construct

Let R0=S1⊕2⊕S2 be the zero-arrow representation of dimension (2,1), and let R1=S1⊕I be the rank-one representation. These are all isoclasses because a map k2→k has rank zero or one. In the semisimple one-vertex subcategory, [S1](2)=ν2[S1⊕2]: the ordinary square counts the q+1 lines, and dividing ν(q+1) by [2]ν=ν+ν−1 gives ν2 using [F4].

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

A representation of dimension (1,1) is one arrow scalar. Its rank is zero, giving S1⊕S2, or nonzero, giving the unique isoclass I. For each middle object, the unique subobject isomorphic to S2 has quotient S1. Thus both Hall numbers in [S1]⋆[S2] are one, and [F2] with the Euler value in step 1.1 gives its displayed formula.

2.2F1F2step 1.1construct

For [S2]⋆[S1], the required subobject is S1 at vertex 1 with quotient S2. Stability forces the arrow to vanish, so the only middle object is S1⊕S2, with coefficient one by [F2] and the Euler value in step 1.1.

2.3F2step 1.1step 1.2construct

The product [S1](2)⋆[S2] has twist ν⟨2S1,S2⟩=ν−2, cancelled by the coefficient ν2 from step 1.2. In each of R0,R1, the full vertex-2 copy of S2 is the unique subobject with quotient S1⊕2. Hence this product is [R0]+[R1].

2.4F2step 1.1step 1.2construct

The last product [S2]⋆[S1](2) has twist ν⟨S2,2S1⟩=1. The only subobject isomorphic to S1⊕2 occurs in R0, where it is the full vertex-1 space; no such subobject is stable in R1 because its arrow is nonzero. The coefficient is ν2 from step 1.2, so this product is ν2[R0].

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.2construct

By associativity from step 1.1, [S1]⋆[S2]⋆[S1]=[S1]⋆[S1⊕S2]. Its twist is ν⟨S1,S1+S2⟩=1. In R0, a subobject S1⊕S2 is obtained by choosing any line at vertex 1, giving q+1 choices; in R1, stability forces that line to be the one-dimensional kernel of the arrow, giving one choice. Thus the middle product is (q+1)[R0]+[R1].

4.1step 2.3step 3.1step 2.4algebra∎

Subtracting the middle product in step 3.1 from the two outer products in steps 2.3 and 2.4 gives (1−(q+1)+ν2)[R0]+(1−1)[R1]=0, since q=ν2. Multiplying by [2]ν! and reindexing the two divided-power terms yields the ordinary symmetric quantum Serre relation from The Hall-normalized extended positive Borel of a loopless quiver.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources