Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Euler-Twisted Hall Products, Green Coproducts, and Quantum Groups: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These finite-field computations bind the Hall normalization, quotient/subobject order, Green coefficient, divided-power Serre convention and the distinction between composition and full Hall.

Companion: green-hall-bialgebras-and-quantum-group-realizations.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

The Kronecker Hall algebra strictly contains its composition subalgebra

Statement

For the two-arrow Kronecker quiver, the degree (1,1) Hall component has q+2 basis classes, whereas its simple-generated composition subalgebra has dimension at most two in that degree. Thus the full Hall algebra is strictly larger than the composition subalgebra.

12ab

The diagram denotes two distinct parallel arrows from vertex 1 to vertex 2. A representation assigns a scalar to each arrow when both vertex spaces are one-dimensional.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Q is the quiver displayed above over Fq.

[F1]

Its finite-dimensional representation category is an acyclic finite-field hereditary Hall category, and dimension vector grades its Hall algebra (Finite-dimensional representations of an acyclic quiver form a hereditary finitary Hall category).

[F2]

The composition subalgebra in this example means the subalgebra of the twisted Hall algebra generated by the vertex-simple classes.

[F3]

The underlying untwisted Hall product is associative (The untwisted Hall product is associative and unital).

[F4]

Every finite field has cardinality q≥2.

Proof

technique · classify the degree component
1.1F1F3algebra

The acyclic Euler form is χ(α,β)=α1β1+α2β2−2α1β2, which is bilinear by [F1]. Define this example’s product by [M]⋆[N]=νχ(deg⁡M,deg⁡N)[M]∗[N], where ∗ is the untwisted Hall product of [F3]. This twist preserves associativity, since χ(α,β)+χ(α+β,γ)=χ(β,γ)+χ(α,β+γ). Thus the composition subalgebra is defined for this quiver.

1.2F1givenalgebra

A representation of dimension (1,1) is a pair (x,y)∈Fq2 of arrow scalars. An isomorphism is a pair of nonzero endpoint scalars (g1,g2), acting by common multiplication by g2/g1. The zero pair is one orbit and gives S1⊕S2. Each nonzero orbit is a line in Fq2, giving q+1 further orbits. Thus the full Hall component has q+2 independent isomorphism-class basis vectors.

2.1F2step 1.2algebra

A product of simples of total degree (1,1) must use S1 and S2 once each. There are only two possible words, [S1]⋆[S2] and [S2]⋆[S1], so the degree component generated by simples has dimension at most two.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1F4algebra∎

Since q≥2 by [F4], q+2>2. The two subspaces have different dimensions, proving strict containment.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

A one-vertex Green coproduct and twisted Hall square

Statement

For the one-vertex zero-arrow quiver, with simple S and R=S⊕S, compute [S]⋆[S]=ν(q+1)[R],Δ′([S])=[S]⊗[0]+[0]⊗[S], and Δ′([R])=[R]⊗[0]+[0]⊗[R]+ν−1[S]⊗[S].

For this example, Δ′ means the coefficient formula Δ′([T])=∑A,Bνdim⁡Adim⁡BPA,BTaT−1[A]⊗[B]; it is the one-vertex specialization of Green’s definition. The product is [A]⋆[B]=νdim⁡Adim⁡B[A]∗[B].

\node[draw,circle] (v) {$1$};

This is the quiver with one vertex and no arrows.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k=Fq, ν=q>1, and S=k as a vector-space representation.

[F1]

The category of finite-dimensional vector spaces is a finite-field hereditary Hall category (Finite-dimensional representations of an acyclic quiver form a hereditary finitary Hall category).

[F2]

The untwisted Hall coefficient counts subspaces and the twisted scalar in this semisimple category is νdim⁡Adim⁡B (The untwisted Hall algebra of a finitary abelian category).

Proof

technique · count subspaces and endpoint-labelled sequences
1.1F1F2algebra

Here Hom⁡(S,S)≅k and YExt⁡1(S,S)=0, so ⟨S,S⟩=1. The subobjects of R=k2 isomorphic to S are its q+1 lines. Thus gS,SR=q+1, and the twisted product is [S]⋆[S]=ν(q+1)[R]. The same count with S as middle object gives Δ′([S])=[S]⊗[0]+[0]⊗[S].

1.2F1F3construct

For the mixed coefficient of [S]⊗[S] in Δ′([R]), an endpoint-labelled exact sequence is an injection i:k→k2 and a surjection p:k2→k with pi=0. There are q2−1 choices for i; for each, the quotient k2/im⁡(i) is one-dimensional and has q−1 isomorphisms to the fixed endpoint k. Hence PS,SR=(q2−1)(q−1). Also aR=∣GL⁡2(k)∣=(q2−1)(q2−q), so PS,SR/aR=1/q.

2.1F2step 1.2algebra∎

The mixed coproduct coefficient is ν⟨S,S⟩/q=ν/q=ν−1 because q=ν2. The only other possible endpoint pairs are (R,0) and (0,R); each contributes coefficient one. This proves the displayed coproduct.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The A2 Hall products and their quantum Serre relation

Statement

For the one-arrow quiver 1→2, let S1,S2 be its simples and let I be the nonzero-arrow representation of dimension (1,1). Then [S1]⋆[S2]=ν−1([S1⊕S2]+[I]),[S2]⋆[S1]=[S1⊕S2], and in degree (2,1) the divided-power Serre relation is [S1](2)⋆[S2]−[S1]⋆[S2]⋆[S1]+[S2]⋆[S1](2)=0. Here x(2)=x2/[2]ν! as in Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi.

12a

Facts & Assumptions

Given: k=Fq, ν=q>1, and the quiver above.

[F1]

Its finite-dimensional representation category is a finite-field hereditary Hall category with vertex simples (Finite-dimensional representations of an acyclic quiver form a hereditary finitary Hall category).

[F2]

Hall products count subobjects with quotient on the left and subobject on the right (The untwisted Hall algebra of a finitary abelian category).

[F3]

The untwisted Hall product is associative (The untwisted Hall product is associative and unital).

[F4]

Divided powers use x(n)=xn/[n]ν! (Quantum integers, factorials, Gaussian binomials and divided powers at qi).

Proof

technique · classify arrow ranks and count stable subspaces
1.1F1F3algebra

The acyclic Euler form in [F1] is χ(α,β)=α1β1+α2β2−α1β2; it is bilinear. Twisting the associative Hall product in [F3] by νχ(α,β) remains associative because χ(α,β)+χ(α+β,γ)=χ(β,γ)+χ(α,β+γ). In particular, χ(e1,e2)=−1, χ(e2,e1)=0, and χ(e1,e1)=1.

1.2F1F2F4construct

Let R0=S1⊕2⊕S2 be the zero-arrow representation of dimension (2,1), and let R1=S1⊕I be the rank-one representation. These are all isoclasses because a map k2→k has rank zero or one. In the semisimple one-vertex subcategory, [S1](2)=ν2[S1⊕2]: the ordinary square counts the q+1 lines, and dividing ν(q+1) by [2]ν=ν+ν−1 gives ν2 using [F4].

2.1F1F2step 1.1construct

A representation of dimension (1,1) is one arrow scalar. Its rank is zero, giving S1⊕S2, or nonzero, giving the unique isoclass I. For each middle object, the unique subobject isomorphic to S2 has quotient S1. Thus both Hall numbers in [S1]⋆[S2] are one, and [F2] with the Euler value in step 1.1 gives its displayed formula.

2.2F1F2step 1.1construct

For [S2]⋆[S1], the required subobject is S1 at vertex 1 with quotient S2. Stability forces the arrow to vanish, so the only middle object is S1⊕S2, with coefficient one by [F2] and the Euler value in step 1.1.

2.3F2step 1.1step 1.2construct

The product [S1](2)⋆[S2] has twist ν⟨2S1,S2⟩=ν−2, cancelled by the coefficient ν2 from step 1.2. In each of R0,R1, the full vertex-2 copy of S2 is the unique subobject with quotient S1⊕2. Hence this product is [R0]+[R1].

2.4F2step 1.1step 1.2construct

The last product [S2]⋆[S1](2) has twist ν⟨S2,2S1⟩=1. The only subobject isomorphic to S1⊕2 occurs in R0, where it is the full vertex-1 space; no such subobject is stable in R1 because its arrow is nonzero. The coefficient is ν2 from step 1.2, so this product is ν2[R0].

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.2construct

By associativity from step 1.1, [S1]⋆[S2]⋆[S1]=[S1]⋆[S1⊕S2]. Its twist is ν⟨S1,S1+S2⟩=1. In R0, a subobject S1⊕S2 is obtained by choosing any line at vertex 1, giving q+1 choices; in R1, stability forces that line to be the one-dimensional kernel of the arrow, giving one choice. Thus the middle product is (q+1)[R0]+[R1].

4.1step 2.3step 3.1step 2.4algebra∎

Subtracting the middle product in step 3.1 from the two outer products in steps 2.3 and 2.4 gives (1−(q+1)+ν2)[R0]+(1−1)[R1]=0, since q=ν2. Multiplying by [2]ν! and reindexing the two divided-power terms yields the ordinary symmetric quantum Serre relation from The Hall-normalized extended positive Borel of a loopless quiver.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources