Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Abel image in its Jacobian

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus g≥1, let p0∈X and let u=up0:X→Jac⁡(X) be the Abel-Jacobi map (The Abel-Jacobi map). Then:

  1. The image u(X) is a compact subset of the complex torus Jac⁡(X) with a one-dimensional complex-graph chart at each of its points, and u is a homeomorphism of X onto u(X); for g≥2 the image has complex dimension one inside the g-dimensional torus, so it is neither open nor a complex subtorus (The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface).
  2. The subgroup of Jac⁡(X) generated by u(X)−u(p0)={u(p)−u(p0):p∈X} is all of Jac⁡(X): every class u((q)−(p)) is a difference of two image points, every degree-zero divisor is a finite sum of such classes, and Jacobi inversion gives the whole group (Jacobi inversion).
  3. For g=1 the image is the whole torus: u:X→Jac⁡(X) is a biholomorphism (Periods of a complex torus). For the explicitly constructed genus-two pentagon curve X0 of Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve, X0 embeds by its Abel-Jacobi map as a compact curve generating the two-dimensional torus Jac⁡(X0)=C2/Λ of Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve.
  4. The map is a bijection onto its image with holomorphic inverse: u(p)=u(q) implies p=q by the embedding theorem, and the inverse is holomorphic because u is locally biholomorphic onto its image.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g≥1, a base point p0, and the Abel-Jacobi map u.

[F1]

u is injective, its derivative is nonzero at every point, it is a homeomorphism onto its compact image, and every point of the image has a chart of Jac⁡(X) in which the image is the graph of a holomorphic map (The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).

[F2]

On Div⁡0(X) the map u is a group homomorphism with u((q)−(p))=u(q)−u(p), and the kernel is the principal divisors (The Abel-Jacobi map, The Abel-Jacobi map is well defined and its degree-zero extension is base-point independent, Abel's theorem for divisors).

[F3]

The degree-zero divisor extension of u is surjective, so every class is u(D) for a degree-zero divisor D, and every degree-zero divisor is a finite Z-combination of point differences (Jacobi inversion, Abel's theorem for divisors).

[F4]

The Jacobian is the complex torus Ω(X)∗/Λ of complex dimension g; for g=1 the Abel-Jacobi map is a biholomorphism onto the whole torus, and Pic⁡0(X)≅Jac⁡(X) (The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface, The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface, Picard zero is the Jacobian, Periods of a complex torus).

[F5]

The pentagon supplier constructs the smooth projective curve y2=x5−1, identifies it analytically with the translation double-pentagon, and proves the integral orbit basis and nonzero normalized periods. Its genus-two model therefore has Jacobian C2/Λ with a full period lattice Λ, and every point of it is represented by a degree-zero divisor (Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve, Jacobi inversion).

[F6]

Full AC is inherited from the Jacobian construction (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

Given: The objects and conventions in the Statement.

1.1F1F4

By [F1], u is injective with nonzero derivative, is a homeomorphism onto its compact image, and is locally biholomorphic onto the graph charts of that image. Thus u(X) is a one-dimensional complex submanifold in the stated chart sense. For g≥2, the ambient dimension is g>1 by [F4]; in every graph chart a small change in a transverse complex coordinate leaves the graph, so the image has empty interior and is not open.

1.2F1F4F5

For g=1 claim 3 is [F4]: u is a biholomorphism onto the whole torus. For the pentagon clause, specialize to X=X0 and take any base point on X0. By [F5] this curve has genus two and Jac⁡(X0)=C2/Λ with full period lattice. Claims 1 and 2 therefore apply to its Abel-Jacobi map: its image is a compact embedded curve generating that torus.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Every difference u(q)−u(p) is the class u((q)−(p)) by [F2]. Finite sums of such differences are images of degree-zero divisors, and conversely every degree-zero divisor is a finite integer sum of point differences. By [F3] the divisor extension is surjective, so the subgroup generated by u(X)−u(p0) is the whole Jacobian. Since u(p0)=0, if u(X) were a complex subtorus, it would already be a subgroup and would equal the subgroup it generates, hence would equal the Jacobian. This is impossible for g≥2 by the dimension and empty-interior calculation in step 1.1. This completes claims 1 and 2.

2.2F1step 1.1

Claim 4 is contained in claim 1: u is injective, so it is a bijection onto its image, and the local biholomorphy of step 1.1 gives a holomorphic inverse on the image.

3.1F6step 1.1step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2∎

Claims 1-4 are steps 1.1, 2.1, 1.2 and 2.2, under the inherited AC of [F6].

Source notes

McMullen's Theorem 15.7 and the surrounding discussion (Riemann Surfaces, printed p. 130) exhibit the curve in its Jacobian as a smooth embedded curve generating the torus; Looijenga's Ch. 7 §2 (printed pp. 60-63) shows the point map, its injectivity for positive genus and the genus-one biholomorphism. The example packages the general embedding theorem with the two explicit models of claims 3.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources