How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Abel image in its Jacobian
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus , let and let be the Abel-Jacobi map (The Abel-Jacobi map). Then:
- The image is a compact subset of the complex torus with a one-dimensional complex-graph chart at each of its points, and is a homeomorphism of onto ; for the image has complex dimension one inside the -dimensional torus, so it is neither open nor a complex subtorus (The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface).
- The subgroup of generated by is all of : every class is a difference of two image points, every degree-zero divisor is a finite sum of such classes, and Jacobi inversion gives the whole group (Jacobi inversion).
- For the image is the whole torus: is a biholomorphism (Periods of a complex torus). For the explicitly constructed genus-two pentagon curve of Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve, embeds by its Abel-Jacobi map as a compact curve generating the two-dimensional torus of Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve.
- The map is a bijection onto its image with holomorphic inverse: implies by the embedding theorem, and the inverse is holomorphic because is locally biholomorphic onto its image.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full AC, a compact connected Riemann surface of genus , a base point , and the Abel-Jacobi map .
is injective, its derivative is nonzero at every point, it is a homeomorphism onto its compact image, and every point of the image has a chart of in which the image is the graph of a holomorphic map (The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface, Biholomorphic maps between complex domains).
On the map is a group homomorphism with , and the kernel is the principal divisors (The Abel-Jacobi map, The Abel-Jacobi map is well defined and its degree-zero extension is base-point independent, Abel's theorem for divisors).
The degree-zero divisor extension of is surjective, so every class is for a degree-zero divisor , and every degree-zero divisor is a finite -combination of point differences (Jacobi inversion, Abel's theorem for divisors).
The Jacobian is the complex torus of complex dimension ; for the Abel-Jacobi map is a biholomorphism onto the whole torus, and (The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface, The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface, Picard zero is the Jacobian, Periods of a complex torus).
The pentagon supplier constructs the smooth projective curve , identifies it analytically with the translation double-pentagon, and proves the integral orbit basis and nonzero normalized periods. Its genus-two model therefore has Jacobian with a full period lattice , and every point of it is represented by a degree-zero divisor (Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve, Jacobi inversion).
Full AC is inherited from the Jacobian construction (The Axiom of Choice).
Verification
Given: The objects and conventions in the Statement.
By [F1], is injective with nonzero derivative, is a homeomorphism onto its compact image, and is locally biholomorphic onto the graph charts of that image. Thus is a one-dimensional complex submanifold in the stated chart sense. For , the ambient dimension is by [F4]; in every graph chart a small change in a transverse complex coordinate leaves the graph, so the image has empty interior and is not open.
For claim 3 is [F4]: is a biholomorphism onto the whole torus. For the pentagon clause, specialize to and take any base point on . By [F5] this curve has genus two and with full period lattice. Claims 1 and 2 therefore apply to its Abel-Jacobi map: its image is a compact embedded curve generating that torus.
Every difference is the class by [F2]. Finite sums of such differences are images of degree-zero divisors, and conversely every degree-zero divisor is a finite integer sum of point differences. By [F3] the divisor extension is surjective, so the subgroup generated by is the whole Jacobian. Since , if were a complex subtorus, it would already be a subgroup and would equal the subgroup it generates, hence would equal the Jacobian. This is impossible for by the dimension and empty-interior calculation in step 1.1. This completes claims 1 and 2.
Claim 4 is contained in claim 1: is injective, so it is a bijection onto its image, and the local biholomorphy of step 1.1 gives a holomorphic inverse on the image.
Claims 1-4 are steps 1.1, 2.1, 1.2 and 2.2, under the inherited AC of [F6].
Source notes
McMullen's Theorem 15.7 and the surrounding discussion (Riemann Surfaces, printed p. 130) exhibit the curve in its Jacobian as a smooth embedded curve generating the torus; Looijenga's Ch. 7 §2 (printed pp. 60-63) shows the point map, its injectivity for positive genus and the genus-one biholomorphism. The example packages the general embedding theorem with the two explicit models of claims 3.
Depends on
- Picard zero is the Jacobian
- The Abel-Jacobi map
- The Axiom of Choice
- Biholomorphic maps between complex domains
- Genus and Euler characteristic of a compact Riemann surface
- The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface
- Period matrix and Jacobian of the pentagon curve
- Periods of a complex torus
- The Abel-Jacobi map is well defined and its degree-zero extension is base-point independent
- The Abel-Jacobi map embeds a positive-genus surface
- Abel's theorem for divisors
- Jacobi inversion
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Curtis T. McMullen, Riemann Surfaces, Harvard Math 213b course notes (2026) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Eduard Looijenga, Riemann Surfaces (2007 author lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)