Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Abel-Jacobi map

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), inherited from the Jacobian definition. Let X be a compact connected Riemann surface of genus g with Jacobian Jac⁡(X)=Ω(X)∗/Λ and quotient projection π:Ω(X)∗→Jac⁡(X) (The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface), and let p0∈X be a base point.

Point map. Coordinate disks make X locally path connected; its connectedness therefore makes it path connected (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open). For p∈X choose a path γ in X from p0 to p and set up0(p):=[ω↦∫γω]∈Jac⁡(X), where [ξ]=ξ+Λ denotes the class modulo the period lattice and ∫γω is the path integral of the holomorphic differential (Path integral of a holomorphic differential on a Riemann surface). The value is independent of the path: if γ,γ′ are two paths from p0 to p, then the closed curve γ∗γ′−1 is a continuous singular cycle and ∫γω−∫γ′ω=∫γ∗γ′−1ω=P([γ∗γ′−1],ω)=e([γ∗γ′−1])(ω) for every ω∈Ω(X) (The period pairing and the period subgroup, The period pairing is well defined and computed by integration), so the two functionals differ by the element e([γ∗γ′−1])∈Λ of the period lattice. The resulting map up0:X→Jac⁡(X) is the Abel-Jacobi map of X with base point p0. It is holomorphic in the atlas of the Jacobian definition, in the following explicit sense: for every q∈X there are an open neighbourhood U of q and a holomorphic map ξ:U→Ω(X)∗ with π∘ξ=up0∣U. It satisfies the addition rule up0(q)−up0(p)=[ω↦∫pqω] for all p,q∈X, where the integral is taken along any path from p to q.

Divisors. Writing points as degree-one divisors, extend up0 by linearity: for D=∑pnp[p]∈Div⁡(X) set up0(D):=∑pnp up0(p)∈Jac⁡(X); the sum is finite because divisors on a compact Riemann surface have finite support (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface). For deg⁡D=0 the class u(D) is independent of the base point p0: the addition rule gives uq0(p)=up0(p)−up0(q0) for every p, so replacing p0 by q0 adds −(∑pnp)up0(q0)=0 whenever ∑pnp=deg⁡D=0. Hence on the subgroup Div⁡0(X) of degree-zero divisors the notation u(D) is base-point free, u:Div⁡0(X)→Jac⁡(X) is a group homomorphism, and u((q)−(p))=[ω↦∫pqω]. Base-point dependence for divisors of nonzero degree is recorded explicitly: for deg⁡D≠0 the two base points give different classes exactly when (deg⁡D)up0(q0)≠0. A nonzero torsion shift can therefore cancel in nonzero degree.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g, the Jacobian quotient Jac⁡(X)=Ω(X)∗/Λ with projection π, the period pairing P and period homomorphism e, and a base point p0∈X.

[F1]

Jac⁡(X)=Ω(X)∗/Λ is the quotient of the algebraic dual Ω(X)∗ by the period subgroup Λ=e(H1(X;Z)), with group law [ξ]+[η]=[ξ+η] and projection π; for g≥1 the definition also fixes a C-basis ω1,…,ωg of Ω(X), and its charts are local inverses of π (The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface).

[F2]

The period homomorphism is e(γ)(ω)=P(γ,ω), and Λ=e(H1(X;Z)) (The period pairing and the period subgroup).

[F3]

For every γ∈H1(X;Z), every continuous singular cycle c representing γ, and every ω∈Ω(X), one has P(γ,ω)=∫cω; the period pairing is independent of the cycle representative and of the chosen symplectic basis (The period pairing is well defined and computed by integration).

[F4]

The path integral of a holomorphic differential is additive under concatenation, changes sign under path reversal, vanishes on a constant path, and is C-linear in the differential (Path integral of a holomorphic differential on a Riemann surface).

[F5]

On a simply connected coordinate disk with coordinate z, a holomorphic differential ω=h(z) dz has a holomorphic local primitive H with H′=h; the definition of the path integral is the sum of endpoint differences of such primitives along a finite subdivision (Every complex analytic function has a primitive on a neighbourhood of each point, Path integral of a holomorphic differential on a Riemann surface, Meromorphic differentials, orders and residues).

[F6]

A map into Cn defined on an open set is holomorphic exactly when its components are holomorphic (Holomorphic maps Cm→Cn and the complex Jacobian matrix, A map into Cn is holomorphic exactly when each of its components is).

[F7]

On compact X every divisor has finite support, Div⁡0(X) is the subgroup of divisors of degree zero, and degrees are additive (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface).

[F8]

Full AC is assumed by the Jacobian definition to select the symplectic and holomorphic bases used in [F1]; here it is inherited, and the local computations make no further arbitrary selection (The Axiom of Choice, The Jacobian of a compact Riemann surface).

[F9]

A Riemann surface is connected and has coordinate disks, hence is locally path connected and therefore path connected (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, A connected, locally path-connected space is path-connected, because its path components are open).

Verification

Given: The objects and conventions in the Definition.

1.1F1F2F3F4

For p∈X, [F9] supplies a path from p0 to p. Let γ,γ′ be paths from p0 to p. The concatenation c:=γ∗γ′−1 is a continuous closed curve, hence a continuous singular 1-cycle; write δ:=[c]∈H1(X;Z) for its homology class. By [F4], ∫γω−∫γ′ω=∫cω for every ω∈Ω(X); by [F3] and [F2], ∫cω=P(δ,ω)=e(δ)(ω). Hence the two functionals differ by the element e(δ)∈Λ, so they represent the same class in Jac⁡(X) and up0(p) is well defined.

2.1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.1

Fix q∈X, take a holomorphic chart z:U→D at q with U a simply connected coordinate disk, and use the basis ω1,…,ωg of [F1], whose selection is covered by the inherited full AC of [F8]. On U write ωi=hi(z) dz with hi holomorphic; by [F5] there are holomorphic primitives Hi on D with Hi(z(q))=0. Fixing any path from p0 to q, concatenation with a path inside U from q to p gives ∫p0pωi=∫p0qωi+Hi(z(p)) for p∈U, by [F4] and [F5]. In the coordinates of [F1], the functional ω↦∫p0pω is therefore the sum of the constant functional with coordinates ∫p0qωi and the Cg-valued function p↦(H1(z(p)),…,Hg(z(p))), which is holomorphic by [F5] and [F6]. This functional-valued map is the holomorphic lift ξ:U→Ω(X)∗ with π∘ξ=up0∣U; after shrinking U, its image lies in one injective quotient chart from [F1], so up0 is holomorphic there.

2.2F4step 1.1

Let p,q∈X, let γ1 be a path from p0 to p and γ2 a path from p to q. By [F4], ∫γ1∗γ2ω=∫γ1ω+∫γ2ω for every ω∈Ω(X); taking classes modulo Λ and using step 1.1 for the well-definedness of both sides gives up0(q)=up0(p)+[ω↦∫γ2ω], that is, up0(q)−up0(p)=[ω↦∫pqω]. The right-hand side is independent of the path from p to q by the same cycle argument as step 1.1.

3.1F7step 2.2

Let q0∈X be a second base point. Applying step 2.2 to the pair p,q0 gives up0(p)−up0(q0)=[ω↦∫q0pω]=uq0(p) for every p∈X. Hence uq0(p)=up0(p)−up0(q0), and for D=∑pnp[p] the two linear extensions differ by (∑pnp)up0(q0)=(deg⁡D) up0(q0); this vanishes when deg⁡D=0, proving base-point independence on Div⁡0(X). In nonzero degree the two base points give the same class exactly when (deg⁡D)up0(q0)=0, which allows torsion cancellation.

4.1F1F7step 2.2step 3.1∎

For D1=∑pnp[p] and D2=∑pmp[p] the linear extension satisfies up0(D1+D2)=∑p(np+mp)up0(p)=up0(D1)+up0(D2), and up0(0)=0; combined with step 3.1 this makes u:Div⁡0(X)→Jac⁡(X) a base-point-free group homomorphism. For the difference of two points, step 2.2 gives u((q)−(p))=up0(q)−up0(p)=[ω↦∫pqω]. If g=0, then [F1] with Ω(X)=0 gives Jac⁡(X)=0 and all statements are trivial.

Source notes

The construction is the standard integration of holomorphic differentials along paths, modulo the period lattice. Looijenga, Riemann Surfaces, Ch. 7 §2, Lemma 7.2 and Corollary 7.3 (printed pp. 60-61), computes I~γ′−I~γ=e([γ∗γ′]) and extends the point map to Div⁡0(S); McMullen, Riemann Surfaces, Ch. 15 (printed p. 129), defines φ and the point map f(Q)=φ(Q−P); Forster, Lectures on Riemann Surfaces, §21.6 (printed pp. 170-171), defines the same map through chains and states that it is determined by D up to the period lattice. The item proves the well-definedness, holomorphy and the addition rule from the local path-integral interface, which accepts the continuous paths used by the polygon side-loop model.

The original scaffold cited def-complex-line-integral-over-a-rectifiable-path and def-complex-contours-reversal-concatenation-and-closedness for ∫γω; those interfaces concern plane contour integrals, while the integral here is taken on a Riemann surface along continuous paths. The direct dependency is now the local-primitive path integral def-path-integral-of-a-holomorphic-differential-on-a-riemann-surface, which supplies additivity, reversal and the holomorphy computations used above. The unused scaffold edge to thm-riemann-bilinear-relations was removed: only the quotient structure of the Jacobian, not the full-lattice property, enters the definition.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

115 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources