Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The period pairing is well defined and computed by integration

Statement

Assume the full Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), used for the symplectic basis and through countable choice in the de Rham comparison. Let X, ai,bi and the period pairing P be as in The period pairing and the period subgroup, with fixed continuous side-loop representatives Ai,Bi. For a continuous singular 1-chain c=∑jnjσj, define ∫cω:=∑jnj∫σjω using the local-primitive path integral of Path integral of a holomorphic differential on a Riemann surface. Then:

  1. For every γ∈H1(X;Z), every continuous singular cycle c representing γ, and every ω∈Ω(X), P(γ,ω)=∫cω. If c is piecewise C1, this is the usual contour integral. Thus the value is independent of the cycle representative and of the chosen symplectic basis.
  2. For every continuous singular 2-chain β, ∫∂βω=0. Hence integration against ω defines a homomorphism on singular homology.
  3. P is additive in γ and C-linear in ω. If g≥1, write v=(a1,b1,…,ag,bg)T and p(ω)=(P(vi,ω))i=12g. For a symplectic change of basis v′=Uv, with U∈GL2g(Z) and UJUT=J for J=diag⁡(J2,…,J2) and J2=(01−10), the new period vector is p′(ω)=Up(ω).
  4. Let JX:HdR1(X;R)→H1(X;R) be the real de Rham comparison of De Rham vector-space comparison with continuous singular cohomology. For ω=α+iβ with real 1-forms α=Re⁡ω and β=Im⁡ω, the complexified comparison satisfies P(γ,ω)=⟨JX[α],γ⟩+i⟨JX[β],γ⟩, where each bracket on the right is the real Kronecker pairing.

For g=0, H1(X;Z)=0, so P=0 and the period vector and basis-change statement are empty. Full AC is also sufficient for the countable-choice hypothesis in the de Rham comparison (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact connected Riemann surface X of genus g, the fixed symplectic basis and side-loop representatives used to define P, and a holomorphic differential ω.

[F1]

Under full AC, the fixed side-loop classes form a symplectic basis of H1(X;Z); on this basis and its continuous loop representatives, the period definition uses integer coordinates and path integrals, and is additive in the homology class and complex-linear in ω (A symplectic homology basis of a compact Riemann surface, The period pairing and the period subgroup).

[F2]

A holomorphic differential has a chart-independent path integral along every continuous path, additive under concatenation, sign-reversing under path reversal, and equal to the usual contour integral on piecewise-C1 paths (Path integral of a holomorphic differential on a Riemann surface).

[F3]

Every holomorphic differential on a compact Riemann surface is a closed smooth complex-valued 1-form (The space of holomorphic differentials and the degree of the canonical divisor).

[F4]

Every point has a coordinate disk on which the coefficient of ω has a holomorphic primitive (Every complex analytic function has a primitive on a neighbourhood of each point, Meromorphic differentials, orders and residues).

[F5]

For any open cover whose interiors cover X, a finite singular chain admits an iterated barycentric subdivision all of whose simplices lie in members of that cover; the subdivision commutes with the singular boundary (Finite chains eventually become cover-small, Cover-small singular chains, Barycentric subdivision is a chain map).

[F6]

A singular n-chain is a finite formal sum of continuous singular n-simplices, its boundary is the alternating sum of its faces, and the continuous singular cochain coboundary is δφ=φ∂ (The singular chain complex and singular homology, Singular cochain complex with coefficients).

[F7]

For a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold, the real de Rham comparison is JX=rX−1IX:HdRk(X;R)→Hk(X;R), where IX is integration on smooth singular simplices and rX is restriction from continuous to smooth cohomology; it is an isomorphism under ACω (De Rham vector-space comparison with continuous singular cohomology, De rham cohomology, De Rham integration cochain, Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes).

[F8]

For an abelian coefficient group G, the Kronecker pairing evaluates a class in H1(X;G) on an integral singular homology class, is independent of both representatives, and is additive; this includes G=C as well as G=R (Singular cohomology with coefficients, Kronecker evaluation pairing, The kronecker pairing is independent of cocycle and cycle representatives).

[F9]

A Riemann surface is a Hausdorff, second-countable topological 2-manifold with a holomorphic atlas; holomorphic coordinate changes are smooth, giving its underlying finite-dimensional smooth structure (Riemann surfaces and holomorphic atlases, Holomorphic functions are real analytic and smooth in their two real coordinates, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts).

[F10]

Full AC implies countable choice; only that consequence is needed by the de Rham comparison (The Axiom of Choice, AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F11]

A complex-valued differential form has unique real and imaginary component forms, and integration is real-linear on each component (Bigraded complex forms and the Dolbeault operators, C is the real coordinate plane, with coordinate arithmetic).

[F12]

Only finitely many local primitive disks need be assigned to the finitely many small triangles of one subdivided simplex; finite choice is available in ZF (Every natural-number-indexed list of nonempty sets has a choice function on its family of values).

Proof

technique · local primitives on subdivided singular simplices, followed by the de Rham comparison
1.1F2F4F5F6F12given

Let σ:Δ2→X be any continuous singular 2-simplex. The coordinate disks equipped with local primitives from [F4] form an open cover of X. By [F5], some iterated barycentric subdivision of σ is a finite sum of small singular 2-simplices, each mapped into a disk carrying a primitive H. For one such triangle τ, [F2] gives ∫τδ0ω=H(τ(v2))−H(τ(v1)), ∫τδ1ω=H(τ(v2))−H(τ(v0)), and ∫τδ2ω=H(τ(v1))−H(τ(v0)); the alternating face sum is zero. Summing over the subdivision cancels interior faces in opposite orientations, and additivity of the edge path integrals recovers the original boundary. Hence ∫∂σω=0.

2.1F6F8step 1.1algebra

Extend Cω(σ):=∫σω from continuous singular 1-simplices to the complex singular 1-cochain by finite linearity. Applying step 1.1 to each simplex in a finite 2-chain β gives Cω(∂β)=∫∂βω=0. Thus Cω is a cocycle and its evaluation on a 1-cycle depends only on that cycle's homology class; it equals the complex-coefficient Kronecker evaluation of [Cω] on that class.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebra

Let γ have coordinates ∑i(miai+nibi) in the basis of [F1], and let c be any continuous singular cycle representing it. The cocycle from step 2.1 evaluates on ai,bi as the path integrals over their fixed representatives Ai,Bi. By [F1] these are exactly the defining values used in P; additivity and the basis expansion therefore give Cω(c)=P(γ,ω). If c is piecewise C1, [F2] identifies this value with the usual contour integral. The same canonical homology functional is obtained from any symplectic basis or representative.

4.1F1F2step 3.1algebra

Additivity of the path integral in the chain and its C-linearity in ω from [F2] imply the stated bilinearity of P by step 3.1. If vi′=∑jUijvj, then P(vi′,ω)=∑jUijP(vj,ω) for each i, so p′=Up. For g=0 both vectors are empty.

5.1F3F7F8F9F10F11step 2.1step 3.1given∎

Write ω=α+iβ as in [F11]. By [F3], α and β are closed real 1-forms. The real and imaginary parts of Cω from step 2.1 are continuous singular 1-cocycles. By [F9], X is a finite-dimensional Hausdorff second-countable smooth manifold, so [F7] applies. On every smooth singular 1-simplex, [F2] and [F7] identify the cocycle restrictions with the de Rham integration cochains IX(α) and IX(β). Thus rX[Re⁡Cω]=IX[α] and rX[Im⁡Cω]=IX[β]; injectivity of rX in [F7] gives [Re⁡Cω]=JX[α] and [Im⁡Cω]=JX[β]. Evaluating by [F8] on γ and using step 3.1 yields the displayed de Rham identity. Full AC supplies the symplectic basis in [F1] and implies ACω through [F10]; the local subdivision and endpoint calculations use only finite choice.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

122 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources