Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

De Rham integration cochain

Definition

For a smooth manifold M, possibly with boundary, and k0, define IMk:Ωk(M)Ck(M;R),IMk(ω)(σ)=σω. On c=σaσσ this means IMk(ω)(c)=σaσσω, a finite sum. In negative degrees IMk is the zero map. Forms and the de Rham complex at a boundary use The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary. No orientation of M is required: the domain simplex has the specified orientation. The name integration cochain map is justified by De Rham integration is a cochain map .

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex assigns an extension-independent real number to a form and smooth simplex, with degree-zero evaluation.

[F2]

Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes identifies smooth cochains with real functions on the supplied simplex set, evaluated by finite sums.

[F3]

The de Rham complex and pullback extend to manifolds with boundary supplies Ω(M), its degree conventions and the boundaryless specialization.

[F4]

Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm gives linearity of Riemann integrals, hence of the Jordan integrals in [F1] by zero extension.

Verification

Given: A smooth manifold M, an integer k0 and a form ωΩk(M).

1.1

Definition [F1] gives one uniquely determined value on every smooth k-simplex. For each finite chain, distributing its coefficients in the displayed sum shows that this function extends to a real linear functional. Two such functionals agreeing on all simplices agree on every finite chain. By [F2] this defines a unique element IMk(ω) of the cochain space. No choice of a vector-space basis or of simplex extensions is made.

F1F2given
2.1

For forms ω,η of degree k and real a,b, alternating evaluation in the definition of pullback gives σ(aω+bη)=aσω+bση. For k>0, the Jordan coefficient integral is linear by [F4]; for k=0, evaluation is linear directly. Thus IMk(aω+bη)(σ)=aIMk(ω)(σ)+bIMk(η)(σ) on every simplex, and step 1.1 makes IMk a real linear map.

F1F4step 1.1
3.1

For k=0 the value at a point simplex is exactly the function value there; for k=1 it is the integral of the pulled-back one-form over the closed oriented interval. Degenerate simplices remain in the supplied set and receive their actual integrals, rather than being removed. If k>dimM, [F3] gives zero source and the map is zero, even though the smooth cochain space may be nonzero. Negative degrees are zero on both sides. On an empty manifold there are no simplices and the only cochain is zero. These conventions include the zero form and zero chain and require no choice.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

31 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources