Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A pushout along an isomorphism recovers the other group

Example

Let f:K→G be an isomorphism and h:K→H any homomorphism. The pushout is H, with legs h∘f−1:G→H and idH. For example, pushing C4←≅C4→C2 along reduction modulo 2 gives C2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the example.

[L1]

Given homomorphisms f:K→G and h:K→H as in def-group-homomorphism, a pushout is a group P with homomorphisms iG:G→P and iH:H→P such that iG∘f=iH∘h, and such that every compatible pair u:G→Q, v:H→Q factors through a unique w:P→Q with w∘iG=u and w∘iH=v. The maps f,h need not be injective. (Pushouts of group homomorphisms).

[L2]

Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G). An isomorphism f:G→H is a bijective group homomorphism (def-group-homomorphism, def-injection-surjection-bijection). When G=H, it is an automorphism of G. Write Aut⁡(G):={f:G→G:f is an automorphism}. (Group isomorphisms, automorphisms and the set Aut⁡(G)).

[L3]

The inverse of a bijective group homomorphism is a group homomorphism. If f:G→H is a bijective group homomorphism, then its set-theoretic inverse f−1:H→G is a group homomorphism. (The inverse of a bijective group homomorphism is a group homomorphism).

[L4]

For every n∈N, view n as its canonical nonnegative integer and put nZ:={nk:k∈Z}. Then the left cosets of nZ in (Z,+) are exactly the congruence classes modulo n, and coset addition is the published addition of congruence classes. Thus (Z,+)/nZ=(Z/n,+) as the same group on the same underlying set. This includes n=0 and n=1. (For every n∈N, the congruence-class group (Z/n,+) is the quotient group (Z,+)/nZ).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The two displayed legs agree on K: (h∘f−1)∘f=h.

givenL1L2L3L4
2.1

For a compatible pair u:G→Q, v:H→Q, one has u=v∘h∘f−1, so v is the unique mediator from H.

step 1.1
3.1

In the cyclic example this says the C4 leg is reduction modulo 2, the C2 leg is the identity, and every compatible cocone factors uniquely through C2.

step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.