How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The arrow category : functions as objects and commuting squares as morphisms
Example
The functor category from the walking-arrow category to is the arrow category .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The walking-arrow category .
Objects and morphisms in a functor category are functors and natural transformations (Functor category ).
Sets and functions form the category (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Verification
Let have objects , their identities, and one further arrow . A functor is exactly a function .
Given functions and , a natural transformation between their corresponding functors consists of maps and satisfying . Thus it is exactly a commuting square.
Vertical composition composes the two side maps of commuting squares. It preserves the square equation, and identity transformations give identity squares. Therefore is precisely as described.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 23 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Example 1.5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)