How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Quivers and quiver homomorphisms form a functor category of set-valued diagrams
Example
Directed multigraphs, also called quivers, are set-valued functors on a fixed two-object indexing category.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The category freely generated by two arrows .
A functor category has functors as objects and natural transformations as morphisms (Functor category ).
The target category is (Sets and functions form the large locally small category ).
Verification
Let have objects , identities, and two distinct arrows . A functor consists of a set of edges, a set of vertices, and source and target maps . This is exactly a quiver.
A natural transformation consists of functions and with and . These are precisely the incidence-preservation equations for a quiver homomorphism.
Since identities and composition are componentwise in the functor category, this identification respects identity quiver maps and their composites. Hence quivers and quiver homomorphisms form .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Example 1.5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)