How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fundamental groupoid of a topological space
Example
For a topological space , paths modulo endpoint-preserving homotopy form a groupoid with and . With this library's traversal-order multiplication on fundamental groups, is the opposite group of and is canonically isomorphic to by path reversal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A topological space .
Endpoint-preserving path homotopy is defined in Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints and is an equivalence relation for each fixed pair of endpoints (Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations).
Paths and their elementary concatenation and reversal constructions are given in Paths, path-connected spaces and path components, while continuous maps compose and maps continuous on a finite closed cover paste continuously (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).
Categories and groupoids have identity, associative composition, and invertible arrows (Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection, Isomorphism, groupoid, and connected category). For an object , multiplication in its automorphism group is categorical composition: .
The traversal-order fundamental-group product is , with inversion induced by path reversal (Based loops and the fundamental group, Loop classes form the group under concatenation).
Verification
Take the points of as objects and define to be the endpoint-preserving homotopy classes of paths from to . For and , put , and take the constant path at as .
If deforms to and deforms to rel endpoints, paste for to for . The endpoint conditions agree along the seam, so the finite closed-pasting argument in [L2] gives an endpoint-preserving homotopy . Thus composition is well defined on classes.
Composing a path with the straight-line homotopies from to and to proves the left and right identity laws. If for and for , then contracts rel endpoints; the analogous formula contracts . Hence reversal supplies a two-sided inverse class.
For three composable paths, let traverse them successively. The two bracketings are and , where for and for , while for and for . The formula is an endpoint-preserving homotopy, so composition is associative on classes.
Steps 2.1, 3.1, and 2.2 make a groupoid. Its automorphisms at are the based-loop classes, but in the traversal-order product of [L4]. Thus the identity on loop classes identifies with . The inversion map is therefore a canonical group isomorphism .
Depends on
- Category, object, morphism, domain, codomain, identity, composition, and hom-collection
- Isomorphism, groupoid, and connected category
- Paths, path-connected spaces and path components
- Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints
- Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations
- Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous
- Based loops and the fundamental group
- Loop classes form the group $\pi_1(X,x_0)$ under concatenation
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 97 results over 20 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Example 1.1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)