Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A coordinate swap defeats an atom-free sock choice

Statement

In the corrected atom-free socks construction, a fresh pair-coordinate swap has a compatible image condition and reverses a proposed decided choice.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The hypotheses, objects, and conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

The atom-free socks symmetric system supplies the forcing order, the names Rn,i and Pn, the block automorphisms, and the finite-support filter.

[F2]

Symmetry lemma for forcing automorphisms transports a forcing decision under the displayed automorphism.

[F3]

An atom-free symmetric model has countable pairs without choice proves that Pn={Rn,0,Rn,1} is a two-element set in the symmetric model, including the dense-set distinctness argument.

Proof

1.1

Suppose p forces that a supported name c is a choice function. Let E support both p and c. Pick n outside the finitely many pair indices occurring in E, and strengthen to qp deciding, after relabelling the two mates if necessary, qc(Pn)=Rn,0. This is a single forcing decision, not a sequence of choices.

F1assume-contra
1.2

Because q has finite domain, choose a natural-number coordinate cutoff beyond all coordinates of q in the nth blocks. Define an automorphism π which swaps the two n-blocks while translating the finitely used internal coordinates to unused coordinates, and fixes E. Then q and πq agree wherever both are defined, hence qπq is a condition.

F1
2.1

The support of c is fixed, so πc=c, while πRn,0=Rn,1 and πPn=Pn. By F2, equivariance transforms the decision in step 1.1 into πqc(Pn)=Rn,1. Their common extension forces Rn,0=Rn,1, contradicting F3. Thus the fresh coordinate swap defeats the proposed choice.

F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2discharge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources