How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Baer sum of two factor sets
Example
Let and with trivial action. If is the normalized cocycle with , then the Baer sum of the corresponding extension with itself has class
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with trivial action and the cocycle .
The Baer sum is the extension-side operation (Baer sum of abelian-kernel extensions).
Under the classification bijection, Baer sum agrees with addition in (The Baer sum agrees with addition in H^2).
Verification
Because is written additively, the cocycle sum satisfies . So as a cocycle.
By [L1], the Baer sum of the extension class of with itself corresponds to the cohomology class of , which step 1.1 identified with . Thus the self-Baer-sum is the split class.
So this example realizes a nontrivial class whose double is zero.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Clara Loh, Group Cohomology, SS 2019 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Caroline Lassueur, Cohomology of Groups, SS 2021 (standard reference, not scraped)