Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A unit sphere checks both layer jump signs

Example

On the unit sphere S1 with outward normal, let both layer densities be the constant 1. The single layer has boundary trace 1 and conormal jump ∂n−S1−∂n+S1=1. The double-layer kernel ∂nyG3 has potential −1 in the unit ball and 0 outside; hence γ−D1−γ+D1=−1. Its common normal derivative is zero. Thus these conventions agree with γ−D−γ+D=−ϕ and ∂n−S−∂n+S=λ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Newton kernel and its fundamental-solution identity, a unit sphere with outward normal, and constant density 1.

[F1]

The kernel is G3=(4π∣x−y∣)−1 (The three-dimensional Laplace Newton kernel).

[F2]

For density one on a radius-R sphere, UR(x)=R for ∣x∣≤R and UR(x)=R2/∣x∣ for ∣x∣≥R; at R=1 the trace is 1 and the interior/exterior normal derivatives are 0 and −1 (A constant density on the sphere gives a constant trace).

[F3]

Differentiation under a compact parameter integral is valid when the integrand and its parameter derivative are continuous on a compact rectangle. Use it successively in the two sphere parameters with area density R2sin⁡θ; for fixed x∉S1, choose R in a small interval around one avoiding ∣x∣, so all kernel derivatives there are uniformly continuous and bounded. (Leibniz's rule on a compact rectangle: an interior parameter derivative with a continuous extension may be passed through a Riemann integral, Surface area and scalar surface integrals on a regular patch)

Proof

1.1F1F2F3givenalgebra

The single-layer trace and conormal sign are exactly [F2]. For the double layer put UR(x)=∫SRG3(x,y)dSy and DR1(x)=∫SR∂nyG3(x,y)dSy. In sphere parameters y=Rω, differentiating R2G3(x,Rω) by [F3] gives ∂RUR=DR1+(2/R)UR: the kernel derivative is the outward source-normal derivative, and the second term differentiates area density.

2.1F2step 1.1givenalgebra∎

For fixed ∣x∣<1 and R sufficiently near one, [F2] gives UR(x)=R, so DR1=1−2=−1. For fixed ∣x∣>1 it gives UR(x)=R2/∣x∣, so DR1=2R/∣x∣−(2/R)(R2/∣x∣)=0. At R=1 the two potentials are constant on their respective sides; therefore their trace jump is −1 and both normal derivatives are zero. This proves both signs without adding a divergence-theorem axiom to the classical example.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources