Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Resultant of two binary linear forms

Example

Let k be a field and let F=aX+bY and G=cX+dY with a,b,c,d∈k be binary forms of nominated degree one. Then Res⁡1,1(F,G)=ad−bc, and this element of k vanishes exactly when F and G have a common point of P1(K) for an algebraic closure K of k. The two zero-form cases F=0 and G=0 are included: then ad−bc=0 and the two forms do have a common projective zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field k, coefficients a,b,c,d∈k, the linear forms F=aX+bY, G=cX+dY of nominated degree 1, and an algebraic closure K of k.

[L1]

For d=e=1 the Sylvester map is (A,B)↦AF+BG from k[X,Y]0⊕k[X,Y]0 to k[X,Y]1, and Res⁡1,1(F,G) is the determinant of its matrix in the ordered bases 1 of each copy of k[X,Y]0 and X,Y of the target (Sylvester resultant of two positive-degree binary forms, For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix).

[L2]

For a field k, an algebraic closure K, and homogeneous F,G of nominated positive degrees, Res⁡(F,G)=0 if and only if F and G vanish together at some point of P1(K); the zero forms are allowed (The binary Sylvester resultant detects a common geometric projective root, An algebraic closure of a field, projective space points).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The domain k[X,Y]0⊕k[X,Y]0 has basis (1,0),(0,1), and Φ(1,0)=F=aX+bY, Φ(0,1)=G=cX+dY are the two columns of the matrix in the target basis X,Y; hence the Sylvester matrix is (acbd) and its determinant is Res⁡1,1(F,G)=ad−bc.

L1algebra
1.2

If ad−bc=0 and (c,d)≠(0,0), then the nonzero vector (d,−c)∈K2 satisfies a⋅d+b⋅(−c)=ad−bc=0 and c⋅d+d⋅(−c)=0, so [d:−c]∈P1(K) is a common zero of F and G. If (c,d)=(0,0) then G=0 vanishes at every point. When also (a,b)=(0,0), F=0 too and any point, such as [1:0], is common; otherwise (b,−a)∈K2 is nonzero and F(b,−a)=ab−ba=0, so [b:−a]∈P1(K) is common.

algebragiven
1.3

Conversely, if F and G vanish together at a point [x:y] of P1(K), then (x,y)≠(0,0) is a nonzero vector orthogonal to both coefficient vectors (a,b) and (c,d), so those two vectors are linearly dependent and ad−bc=0.

algebragiven
2.1

Steps 1.1-1.3 show that ad−bc=0 if and only if F and G have a common zero in P1(K); this agrees with the general criterion [L2], and the zero-form cases are covered by step 1.2.

L2step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources